Yanan Li, Ismail Muhammad Azzam, Aminuddin Asrul
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia.
Department of Fine Arts and Art Design, Yuncheng Advanced Normal College, Shanxi, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 5;10(4):e25627. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25627. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
Rural tourism has been widely recognized as a means of promoting the revival of traditional villages and has been supported by numerous researchers. It has the potential to provide significant social and economic advantages, making it a popular strategy for rural development in both developed and developing countries. Nevertheless, a growing body of research has substantiated the significant disruptions that rural tourism has imposed on traditional villages. This study employed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) qualitative method to systematically analyze 92 papers from WOS and SCOPUS that investigate the impact of rural tourism on traditional villages. The papers were categorized into five groups: spatial, economic, sociocultural, and holistic. This categorization allowed for the identification of the purpose, theme, sub-topics, research methods, and data sources used in these papers, which in turn provided an overview of the characteristics and overall trends in research in this field. It compensates for the deficiencies of lesser reviews that just emphasize rural tourism as the primary catalyst for the sustainable development of traditional villages. Based on a thorough investigation, this paper asserts that the development of tourism in traditional villages should be differentiated from typical rural tourism sites that prioritize the preferences of tourists. The primary objective should be to prioritize the preservation of community values, with a strong emphasis on community participation. This should be done while considering the interests of various stakeholders and promoting a diverse range of livelihoods that are rooted in traditional practices. By doing so, the essence of authenticity in traditional villages can be reinforced, leading to a greater sense of connection and loyalty among tourists. The preservation of traditional village genes fosters a symbiotic relationship with rural tourism, resulting in a mutually beneficial cycle.
乡村旅游已被广泛认为是促进传统村落复兴的一种手段,并得到了众多研究者的支持。它有潜力带来显著的社会和经济优势,使其成为发达国家和发展中国家农村发展的一项流行战略。然而,越来越多的研究证实了乡村旅游给传统村落带来的重大破坏。本研究采用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)定性方法,系统分析了来自WOS和SCOPUS的92篇研究乡村旅游对传统村落影响的论文。这些论文被分为五组:空间、经济、社会文化和整体。这种分类有助于确定这些论文中使用的目的、主题、子主题、研究方法和数据来源,进而提供了该领域研究的特征和总体趋势概述。它弥补了那些只强调乡村旅游是传统村落可持续发展主要催化剂的较少综述的不足。在深入调查的基础上,本文断言,传统村落的旅游发展应与以游客偏好为优先的典型乡村旅游景点有所区别。首要目标应该是优先保护社区价值观,大力强调社区参与。这样做的同时要考虑到各利益相关者的利益,并促进基于传统习俗的多样化生计。通过这样做,可以强化传统村落的本真精髓,增强游客之间的联系感和忠诚度。保护传统村落基因与乡村旅游形成一种共生关系,从而产生互利循环。