Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, The Affiliated Provincial Pediatric Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 39, Wangjiang Road, Hefei, China.
No. 91126 Military Hospital of Chinese PLA, No. 116, Youyi Road, Dalian, China.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Apr;144(4):1557-1563. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05236-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
The current published evidence for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with failed closed reduction (CR) following failed Pavlik harness (PH) treatment is still limited. This study aimed to determine whether an one-stage open reduction (OR) would lead to a similar outcome to a two-stage OR in these patients. Meanwhile, the occurrence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and further surgery (pelvic osteotomy, PO) within the follow-up period was investigated.
A consecutive series of DDH patients who failed CR following failed PH treatment and received OR finally between January 2008 and December 2020 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups. One group of which received OR immediately after failed CR (one-stage OR group, Group A), and the other received a delayed OR (two-stage OR group, Group B). The McKay's criteria, acetabular index (AI) and the degree of dislocation of the hips were evaluated for the final outcomes.
At the last follow-up, 54 (84.4%) of the 64 hips in Group A and 26 (83.9%) of 31 hips in Group B were in excellent or good condition. Comparison between the two groups revealed that there were no differences in terms of McKay grading (P = 0.950), AI (P = 0.783), incidence of AVN (P = 0.745), and also incidence of PO (P = 1.000). However, a significant lower mean AI was found in Group A, when the OR was performed in Group B (31.06 ± 4.45° vs. 33.87 ± 4.12°, P = 0.004).
Both of the one- and two-stage OR may acheive favorable outcomes. Moreover, one-stage OR is of without the general anesthesia risk associated with two-stage OR. We therefore advocate that an OR should be performed in appropriate DDH patients during the same session once a failed CR is detected.
目前,对于经失败的帕夫利克吊带(Pavlik harness,PH)治疗后闭合复位(CR)失败的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)的治疗,已有研究结果仍十分有限。本研究旨在比较一期切开复位(OR)和二期 OR 治疗此类患者的效果。同时,我们还观察了随访期间股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)的发生情况和进一步的手术(骨盆截骨术,PO)。
回顾性分析了 2008 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,因 PH 治疗失败后 CR 失败而最终接受 OR 的 DDH 患者的连续病例系列。患者被分为两组,一组患者在 CR 失败后立即接受 OR(一期 OR 组,A 组),另一组患者接受延迟 OR(二期 OR 组,B 组)。最后根据 McKay 评分、髋臼指数(AI)和髋关节脱位程度评估最终结果。
在末次随访时,A 组 64 髋中 54 髋(84.4%)和 B 组 31 髋中 26 髋(83.9%)的情况为优或良。两组之间的比较结果显示,McKay 分级(P = 0.950)、AI(P = 0.783)、AVN 发生率(P = 0.745)和 PO 发生率(P = 1.000)均无差异。然而,当 B 组患者接受 OR 时,A 组的平均 AI 显著更低(31.06±4.45° vs. 33.87±4.12°,P = 0.004)。
一期和二期 OR 均可获得良好的结果。此外,一期 OR 无需全身麻醉,避免了二期 OR 相关的全麻风险。因此,我们主张一旦发现 CR 失败,应在同一时间段内对合适的 DDH 患者进行 OR。