Marker Madeline M, Choi Janet S, Huang Tina C
University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2024 Feb 22:1455613241230245. doi: 10.1177/01455613241230245.
and have been considered normal aural flora. Their significance in active infection is controversial. We examined a series of patients presenting with acute and chronic otitis media whose ear canal culture isolated and and explored possible pathogenicity, associated factors, and outcomes. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to a tertiary center outpatient clinic between 2017 and 2022 with otologic microscopic examination of active infection and ear canal culture isolating or only. Clinical course was collected including history, microscopic otoscopy findings, interventions given, outcomes, and sensitivity results. A total of 13 patients (10 with and 3 with ) were included. Majority of the patients had a history of otologic surgery (92%) and tympanic membrane perforation (62%). All were treated with combinations of antibiotic otic drops (ie, fluoroquinolone, sulfa, or aminoglycoside based) ± oral antibiotics (ie, penicillin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Otorrhea resolved among majority of patients. Otorrhea and mucosalization returned or continued among 4 patients. Sensitivity results demonstrated that 2 of 3 strains of were resistant to clindamycin. There was no resistance against for tested antibiotics. Our findings suggest the potential pathogenicity of and , especially among patients with prior ear surgery and tympanic membrane perforation. Violation of the epithelial barrier from surgery or trauma may contribute to their pathogenicity. Future study is warranted to elucidate pathogenicity of normal aural flora and its mechanisms.
它们被认为是正常的耳内菌群。它们在活动性感染中的意义存在争议。我们检查了一系列患有急性和慢性中耳炎的患者,这些患者的耳道培养物分离出了[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2],并探讨了可能的致病性、相关因素和结果。这是一项对2017年至2022年间到三级中心门诊就诊的患者进行的回顾性病历审查,这些患者经耳镜检查有活动性感染,耳道培养物仅分离出[具体细菌名称1]或[具体细菌名称2]。收集了临床病程,包括病史、耳镜检查结果、给予的干预措施、结果和药敏结果。共纳入13例患者(10例分离出[具体细菌名称1],3例分离出[具体细菌名称2])。大多数患者有耳科手术史(92%)和鼓膜穿孔史(62%)。所有患者均接受了抗生素耳滴剂(即基于氟喹诺酮、磺胺或氨基糖苷类)±口服抗生素(即青霉素或甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑)的联合治疗。大多数患者的耳漏症状得到缓解。4例患者的耳漏和黏膜化症状复发或持续存在。药敏结果显示,3株[具体细菌名称1]中有2株对克林霉素耐药。所检测的抗生素对[具体细菌名称2]均无耐药性。我们的研究结果表明[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]具有潜在致病性,尤其是在有既往耳部手术和鼓膜穿孔的患者中。手术或创伤导致的上皮屏障破坏可能导致其致病性。有必要进行进一步的研究以阐明正常耳内菌群的致病性及其机制。