Meehan Edward, Parker Catriona, Ayton Darshini, Katz Naomi, Gold Michelle, Wang Yufei, Ralapanawa Dasuni, Kwok Xin, Banaszak-Holl Jane
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Palliative Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Oct 1;42(8):10499091241287559. doi: 10.1177/10499091241287559.
Current research has shown that inpatient palliative care (PC) services are under-utilized, poorly integrated, and frequently introduced too late during inpatient hospital stays. The aim of this study was to identify a comprehensive list of multi-disciplinary facilitators and barriers to inpatient PC in Australian hospitals through a scoping literature review. This review identified articles published since 2000 from 3 electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE and Embase), which included discussion of collaboration among non-palliative care clinicians and palliative care professionals in Australian hospitals. We used an inductive approach to identifying key domains of barriers and facilitators. Thirty-four articles met inclusion criteria following full text review. Barriers and facilitators were categorized in 7 domains: (1) Patient concerns, (2) Family concerns, (3) Clinician knowledge, education, and experience in palliative care, (4) Recognition and acceptance of prognosis when a patient was dying or needing end of life treatment, (5) Reconciliation of individual and professional values around PC, (6) Clinician access to resources for PC in the hospital, and (7) Communication between the PC team and ward clinicians. Each domain included potentially substantial barriers to PC delivery and practice. However, given the small sample sizes and specialized settings of many included studies, it was difficult to draw conclusions on the relative significance of different barriers across hospitals. This review identified a number of barriers and facilitators across studies. Subsequent research needs to more comprehensively compare factors impacting PC use in order to improve implementation of PC across hospital settings.
当前研究表明,住院姑息治疗(PC)服务未得到充分利用,整合不佳,且在住院期间引入时间往往过晚。本研究的目的是通过范围界定文献综述,确定澳大利亚医院住院PC多学科促进因素和障碍的综合清单。该综述检索了自2000年以来发表于3个电子数据库(CINAHL Plus、MEDLINE和Embase)的文章,其中包括对澳大利亚医院非姑息治疗临床医生与姑息治疗专业人员之间合作的讨论。我们采用归纳法确定障碍和促进因素的关键领域。经过全文审查,34篇文章符合纳入标准。障碍和促进因素分为7个领域:(1)患者关切;(2)家属关切;(3)临床医生在姑息治疗方面的知识、教育和经验;(4)患者临终或需要临终治疗时对预后的认识和接受;(5)围绕PC的个人和专业价值观的协调;(6)临床医生在医院获取PC资源的情况;(7)PC团队与病房临床医生之间的沟通。每个领域都包括PC提供和实践中潜在的重大障碍。然而,鉴于许多纳入研究的样本量较小且设置特殊,很难就不同障碍在各医院的相对重要性得出结论。本综述确定了多项跨研究的障碍和促进因素。后续研究需要更全面地比较影响PC使用的因素,以改善PC在各医院环境中的实施情况。