Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vascular. 2024 Dec;32(6):1398-1402. doi: 10.1177/17085381241236575. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.
A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.
We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates ( = .001), but not with higher mortality rates ( = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.
TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.
胸主动脉瘤(TAAs)是一种发病率越来越高的疾病,具有显著的相关发病率和死亡率。胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)是主要的治疗方法。本研究旨在分析单中心治疗 TAA 的经验,并确定可能导致不良结局的危险因素。
对我院 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间收治的所有 TAA 患者的病历进行回顾性分析。从患者病历中提取数据。主要结局为全因死亡率,次要结局为与手术相关的发病率(血管入路并发症、骨髓缺血、中风、内漏、移位、瘤囊扩大>5mm)以及 1、6 和 12 个月随访时需要再次干预的情况。对数据进行描述性和推断性分析。统计分析使用 IBM 统计软件包(SPSS)进行。
在此期间,我们共发现 34 例 TAA 患者接受了治疗。平均年龄为 68 岁[47-87],79.4%为男性。平均瘤径为 63mm[35-100],55.9%为梭形,44.1%为囊状。大多数(91.2%)位于降主动脉,其中 3 例(8.8%)延伸至主动脉弓。最常见的病因是退行性变 22 例(64.7%),其次是主动脉夹层 8 例(23.5%)。19 例(61.3%)患者行择期手术,12 例(38.7%)行紧急修复。24 例(77.4%)患者选择 TEVAR 治疗,其余 7 例(22.6%)采用杂交手术治疗。平均住院时间为 10 天[2-80](择期修复 6 天,紧急修复 16 天,.016)。随访时间从 1 个月到 10 年不等。1 年随访时,全因死亡率为 15%,发病率为 30%(6 例患者发生 1a 型内漏),需要再次干预的比例为 22%。瘤径是与手术相关的发病率的显著危险因素(无并发症患者的瘤径中位数为 73.5mm,而有并发症患者的瘤径中位数为 56.0mm;.027)。1a 型内漏的存在与较高的再次干预率显著相关(.001),但与较高的死亡率无关(.515)。年龄、女性、病因和紧急修复与结局无显著差异。
TEVAR 被证明是治疗 TAA 的有效方法,在短期和中期随访中效果良好。TAA 应尽早诊断,并在符合标准时及时治疗,以预防不良结局。