Brinia Maria-Evgenia, Kapsali Ioanna, Giagkou Nikolaos, Constantinides Vasilios C
First Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Neurol Int. 2023 Dec 19;16(1):1-19. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16010001.
Various MRI markers-including midbrain and pons areas (M, P) and volumes (M, P), ratios (M/P, M/P), and composite markers (magnetic resonance imaging Parkinsonism Indices 1,2; MRPI 1,2)-have been proposed as imaging markers of Richardson's syndrome (RS) and multiple system atrophy-Parkinsonism (MSA-P). A systematic review/meta-analysis of relevant studies aiming to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging markers is lacking.
Pubmed and Scopus were searched for studies with >10 patients (RS, MSA-P or CBS) and >10 controls with data on M, P, M, P, M/P, M/P, MRPI 1, and MRPI 2. Cohen's , as a measure of effect size, was calculated for all markers in RS, MSA-P, and CBS.
Twenty-five studies on RS, five studies on MSA-P, and four studies on CBS were included. Midbrain area provided the greatest effect size for differentiating RS from controls (Cohen's = -3.10; < 0.001), followed by M/P and MRPI 1. MSA-P had decreased midbrain and pontine areas. Included studies exhibited high heterogeneity, whereas publication bias was low.
Midbrain area is the optimal MRI marker for RS, and pons area is optimal for MSA-P. M/P and MRPIs produce smaller effect sizes for differentiating RS from controls.
多种MRI标志物,包括中脑和脑桥区域(M、P)及体积(M、P)、比率(M/P、M/P)和复合标志物(磁共振成像帕金森综合征指数1、2;MRPI 1、2),已被提议作为理查森综合征(RS)和多系统萎缩帕金森型(MSA-P)的影像学标志物。目前缺乏旨在比较这些影像学标志物诊断准确性的相关研究的系统评价/荟萃分析。
在Pubmed和Scopus数据库中检索患者数超过10例(RS、MSA-P或皮质基底节综合征[CBS])且对照超过10例,并包含M、P、M、P、M/P、M/P、MRPI 1和MRPI 2数据的研究。计算RS、MSA-P和CBS中所有标志物的Cohen's d效应量。
纳入了25项关于RS的研究、5项关于MSA-P的研究和4项关于CBS的研究。中脑区域在区分RS与对照方面的效应量最大(Cohen's d = -3.10;P < 0.001),其次是M/P和MRPI 1。MSA-P的中脑和脑桥区域减小。纳入的研究显示出高度异质性,而发表偏倚较低。
中脑区域是RS的最佳MRI标志物,脑桥区域是MSA-P的最佳标志物。M/P和MRPI在区分RS与对照方面的效应量较小。