Guérineau Cécile, Broseghini Anna, Lõoke Miina, Dehesh Giulio, Mongillo Paolo, Marinelli Lieta
Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Independent Researcher, Via Chiesanuova 139, 35136 Padova, Italy.
Vet Sci. 2024 Feb 2;11(2):67. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11020067.
There is a growing interest in performing playback experiments to understand which acoustical cues trigger specific behavioral/emotional responses in dogs. However, very limited studies have focused their attention on more basic aspects of hearing such as sensitivity, i.e., the identification of minimal intensity thresholds across different frequencies. Most previous studies relied on electrophysiological methods for audiograms for dogs, but these methods are considered less accurate than assessments based on behavioral responses. To our knowledge, only one study has established hearing thresholds using a behavioral assessment on four dogs but using a method that did not allow potential improvement throughout the sessions. In the present study, we devised an assessment procedure based on a staircase method. Implying the adaptation of the assessed intensity on the dogs' performance, this approach grants several assessments around the actual hearing threshold of the animal, thereby increasing the reliability of the result. We used such a method to determine hearing thresholds at three frequencies (0.5, 4.0, and 20.0 kHz). Five dogs were tested in each frequency. The hearing thresholds were found to be 19.5 ± 2.8 dB SPL at 0.5 kHz, 14.0 ± 4.5 dB SPL at 4.0 kHz, and 8.5 ± 12.8 dB SPL at 20.0 kHz. No improvement in performance was visible across the procedure. While the thresholds at 0.5 and 4.0 kHz were in line with the previous literature, the threshold at 20 kHz was remarkably lower than expected. Dogs' ability to produce vocalization beyond 20 kHz, potentially used in short-range communication, and the selective pressure linked to intraspecific communication in social canids are discussed as potential explanations for the sensitivity to higher frequencies.
为了了解哪些声学线索会引发狗的特定行为/情绪反应,进行回放实验的兴趣与日俱增。然而,极少有研究关注听力的更基本方面,比如灵敏度,即确定不同频率下的最小强度阈值。以前的大多数研究依靠电生理方法来获取狗的听力图,但这些方法被认为不如基于行为反应的评估准确。据我们所知,只有一项研究通过对四只狗进行行为评估来确定听力阈值,但所使用的方法在整个实验过程中无法进行潜在改进。在本研究中,我们设计了一种基于阶梯法的评估程序。这种方法根据狗的表现调整评估强度,能在动物实际听力阈值附近进行多次评估,从而提高结果的可靠性。我们用这种方法确定了三个频率(0.5、4.0和20.0千赫)的听力阈值。每个频率测试了五只狗。结果发现,0.5千赫时的听力阈值为19.5±2.8分贝声压级,4.0千赫时为14.0±4.5分贝声压级,20.0千赫时为8.5±12.8分贝声压级。在整个实验过程中,狗的表现没有明显改善。虽然0.5千赫和4.0千赫时的阈值与先前文献一致,但20千赫时的阈值明显低于预期。狗发出超过20千赫叫声的能力(可能用于近距离交流)以及与社会性犬科动物种内交流相关的选择压力,被作为对高频灵敏度的潜在解释进行了讨论。