• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性荨麻疹抗组胺治疗临床应答风险计算器的建立和内部验证。

Risk calculator of the clinical response to antihistamines in chronic urticaria: Development and internal validation.

机构信息

Group of Clinical and Experimental Allergy, "IPS University" Clinic, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Internal Medicine Department, "San Vicente" Clinic, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0295791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295791. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295791
PMID:38394074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10889609/
Abstract

Early detection of CSU patients with low probability of a clinical response with antihistamines could undergo prompt initiation of therapeutic alternatives. The aim of the study was to develop and internally validate a model for predicting the clinical response to antihistamines in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who consult allergology and dermatology care centers. A cohort of CSU patients, recruited from four participating centers, were followed up for 12 months. Fifteen candidate variables were selected to be included in the multivariate model and then internal validation was done with bootstrap analysis with 1000 simulations. The outcome variable, clinical response to antihistamines, was evaluated with the UAS (Urticaria Activity Score) scale for seven days: "No response to antihistamines" was defined as UAS7 ≥7 points after at least one month with a maximum dose of antihistamines, while "Response to antiH1" was defined as UAS7 ≤6 points for at least three months with the use of antiH1. A total of 790 patients were included. Among the different models analyzed, the model that included age, angioedema, anxiety/depression, time with the disease, NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) intolerance, and UAS7 baseline was considered the one with the best performance (accuracy 0.675, HL 0.87, AUC 0.727). The internal validation analyses demonstrated good consistency of the model. In conclusion, this prediction model identifies the probability of response to antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. The model could be useful for a personalized therapeutic approach according to individual patient risk.

摘要

早期发现抗组胺药物治疗反应可能性低的 CSU 患者可以迅速开始治疗替代方案。本研究旨在为成人慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)患者开发和内部验证一种预测抗组胺药物临床反应的模型,这些患者在过敏和皮肤科就诊。从四个参与中心招募了一组 CSU 患者,对他们进行了 12 个月的随访。选择了 15 个候选变量来纳入多变量模型,然后使用 bootstrap 分析进行内部验证,模拟次数为 1000 次。使用 UAS(荨麻疹活动评分)量表评估抗组胺治疗的临床反应,为期 7 天:“抗组胺治疗无反应”定义为在至少一个月内使用最大剂量抗组胺药物后 UAS7≥7 分,而“抗 H1 反应”定义为至少三个月内使用抗 H1 时 UAS7≤6 分。共纳入 790 例患者。在分析的不同模型中,包含年龄、血管性水肿、焦虑/抑郁、疾病持续时间、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)不耐受和 UAS7 基线的模型被认为是性能最佳的模型(准确性 0.675、HL 0.87、AUC 0.727)。内部验证分析表明该模型具有良好的一致性。总之,该预测模型可识别慢性自发性荨麻疹患者对抗组胺药物的反应概率。该模型可根据个体患者的风险进行个性化治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/0a78c18b66b9/pone.0295791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/be41af1e7e71/pone.0295791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/97f22749d58d/pone.0295791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/0a78c18b66b9/pone.0295791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/be41af1e7e71/pone.0295791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/97f22749d58d/pone.0295791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c994/10889609/0a78c18b66b9/pone.0295791.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk calculator of the clinical response to antihistamines in chronic urticaria: Development and internal validation.慢性荨麻疹抗组胺治疗临床应答风险计算器的建立和内部验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0295791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295791. eCollection 2024.
2
Dramatic improvement with colchicine in antihistamine- and omalizumab-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria.秋水仙碱治疗抗组胺药和奥马珠单抗耐药性慢性自发性荨麻疹疗效显著。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Dec;47(12):2308-2310. doi: 10.1111/ced.15397. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
3
A retrospective analysis omalizumab treatment patterns in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a real-world study in Belgium.一项奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的回顾性分析:比利时真实世界研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jan;34(1):127-134. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15684. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Remibrutinib demonstrates favorable safety profile and sustained efficacy in chronic spontaneous urticaria over 52 weeks.瑞比鲁替尼在52周以上的慢性自发性荨麻疹治疗中显示出良好的安全性和持续疗效。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Feb;153(2):479-486.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
5
Factors Associated With Refractoriness to an Up to Fourfold Dosage of Antihistamines in Isolated Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.与孤立性慢性自发性荨麻疹对抗组胺药物高达四倍剂量的耐药性相关的因素。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2022 Nov-Dec;26(6):593-599. doi: 10.1177/12034754221128819. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Omalizumab in elderly patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: An Italian real-life experience.奥马珠单抗治疗老年慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的真实世界经验:意大利研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Mar;120(3):318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.12.007.
7
Real-life data on the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in monotherapy or combined for chronic spontaneous urticaria: a retrospective cohort study.奥马珠单抗单药或联合治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹的有效性和安全性的真实世界数据:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Mar;31(2):204-209. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1589639. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Comparing four immunosuppressive agents for chronic spontaneous urticaria-A network meta-analysis.比较四种免疫抑制剂治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹的疗效:网状 Meta 分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Oct;123:110577. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110577. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
Effectiveness of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria assessed with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study.奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹的疗效评估:一项前瞻性研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Oct;32(10):1761-1767. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15045. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria with an inadequate response to H1-antihistamines: an expert opinion.对H1抗组胺药反应不足的慢性自发性荨麻疹的治疗:专家意见
Eur J Dermatol. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):10-19. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2905.

本文引用的文献

1
The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria.国际 EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI 荨麻疹定义、分类、诊断和管理指南。
Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):734-766. doi: 10.1111/all.15090. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
A protocol for the development and internal validation of a model to predict clinical response to antihistamines in urticaria patients.用于开发和内部验证预测荨麻疹患者对抗组胺药物临床反应的模型的方案。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0239962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239962. eCollection 2020.
3
The global burden of chronic urticaria for the patient and society.
慢性荨麻疹给患者和社会带来的全球负担。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Feb;184(2):226-236. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19561. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
5
Clinical Characterization of Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria according to Anti-TPO IgE Levels.根据抗甲状腺过氧化物酶 IgE 水平对慢性自发性荨麻疹患者进行临床特征分析。
J Immunol Res. 2019 Dec 7;2019:4202145. doi: 10.1155/2019/4202145. eCollection 2019.
6
Eosinopenia, in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, Is Associated with High Disease Activity, Autoimmunity, and Poor Response to Treatment.慢性自发性荨麻疹中的嗜酸性粒细胞减少与高疾病活动度、自身免疫及治疗反应不佳相关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jan;8(1):318-325.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
7
How to Treat Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with Omalizumab: Questions and Answers.如何使用奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹:问答
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jan;8(1):113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies.衡量报告指南依从性的一致性:以评估预测模型研究报告完整性的TRIPOD为例。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e025611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025611.
9
Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria.信息准则的灵敏度和特异性。
Brief Bioinform. 2020 Mar 23;21(2):553-565. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz016.
10
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.