• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care and Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (K.G.M., J.B.R.).

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, York, United Kingdom (R.F.W., M.W.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.

DOI:10.7326/M18-1377
PMID:30596876
Abstract

Prediction models in health care use predictors to estimate for an individual the probability that a condition or disease is already present (diagnostic model) or will occur in the future (prognostic model). Publications on prediction models have become more common in recent years, and competing prediction models frequently exist for the same outcome or target population. Health care providers, guideline developers, and policymakers are often unsure which model to use or recommend, and in which persons or settings. Hence, systematic reviews of these studies are increasingly demanded, required, and performed. A key part of a systematic review of prediction models is examination of risk of bias and applicability to the intended population and setting. To help reviewers with this process, the authors developed PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) for studies developing, validating, or updating (for example, extending) prediction models, both diagnostic and prognostic. PROBAST was developed through a consensus process involving a group of experts in the field. It includes 20 signaling questions across 4 domains (participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis). This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale for including each domain and signaling question and guides researchers, reviewers, readers, and guideline developers in how to use them to assess risk of bias and applicability concerns. All concepts are illustrated with published examples across different topics. The latest version of the PROBAST checklist, accompanying documents, and filled-in examples can be downloaded from www.probast.org.

摘要

在医疗保健中,预测模型使用预测因素来估计个体出现某种情况或疾病(诊断模型)或将来出现某种情况或疾病(预后模型)的概率。近年来,关于预测模型的出版物越来越多,对于相同的结局或目标人群,往往存在相互竞争的预测模型。医疗保健提供者、指南制定者和决策者通常不确定应该使用哪个模型,也不确定在哪些人群或环境中使用。因此,对这些研究进行系统评价的需求、要求和实施越来越多。预测模型系统评价的一个关键部分是检查偏倚风险和对目标人群和环境的适用性。为了帮助评论者进行这一过程,作者开发了 PROBAST(预测模型风险偏倚评估工具),用于开发、验证或更新(例如,扩展)预测模型,包括诊断和预后模型。PROBAST 通过一个涉及该领域专家的共识过程开发。它包括 4 个领域(参与者、预测因素、结局和分析)的 20 个信号问题。本解释和说明文件描述了纳入每个领域和信号问题的基本原理,并指导研究人员、评论者、读者和指南制定者如何使用这些问题来评估偏倚风险和适用性问题。所有概念都用不同主题的已发表示例来说明。PROBAST 清单的最新版本、配套文件和填写示例可从 www.probast.org 下载。

相似文献

1
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
2
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58. doi: 10.7326/M18-1376.
3
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的诊断和预后预测模型研究报告指南(TRIPOD-AI)和偏倚风险工具(PROBAST-AI)制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.
4
Assessing the quality of prediction models in health care using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST): an evaluation of its use and practical application.使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估医疗保健中预测模型的质量:对其使用和实际应用的评估
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111732. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111732. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):解释和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Prognostic models for predicting clinical disease progression, worsening and activity in people with multiple sclerosis.用于预测多发性硬化症患者临床疾病进展、恶化和活动的预后模型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):CD013606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013606.pub2.
9
Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1142-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
10
Appraising prediction research: a guide and meta-review on bias and applicability assessment using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST).评价预测研究:使用预测模型风险偏倚评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚和适用性的指南和元综述。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Dec;26(12):939-947. doi: 10.1111/nep.13913. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive models for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a systematic review.化疗引起的口腔黏膜炎的预测模型:一项系统综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 20;15:1608505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1608505. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence of Chinese prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy based on magnetic resonance imaging examination: a systematic review.基于磁共振成像检查的中国前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险预测模型:一项系统综述
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):8648-8662. doi: 10.21037/qims-2024-2843. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
3
Systematic review of prognostic models in Parkinson's disease.
帕金森病预后模型的系统评价
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Aug 29;11(1):266. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01112-x.
4
Energy expenditure measurement in critical care: Implications for personalized nutrition support.重症监护中的能量消耗测量:对个性化营养支持的启示。
World J Crit Care Med. 2025 Sep 9;14(3):105299. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105299.
5
Are We Accurately Predicting Mortality in Renal Cancer? A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models.我们是否准确预测了肾癌的死亡率?预后模型的系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 19;14(16):5851. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165851.
6
Risk prediction models for complications after flap repair surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.皮瓣修复术后并发症的风险预测模型:一项系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03072-8.
7
Risk prediction models for depression in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症幸存者抑郁症风险预测模型:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43978. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043978.
8
Diagnostic Prediction Models for Primary Care, Based on AI and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review.基于人工智能和电子健康记录的基层医疗诊断预测模型:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 22;13:e62862. doi: 10.2196/62862.
9
Prognostic models for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: living systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.2型糖尿病患者心血管和肾脏结局的预后模型:观察性研究的实时系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Med. 2025 Aug 14;4(1):e001369. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001369. eCollection 2025.
10
The value of pregnancy-related factors in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.妊娠相关因素在预测心血管疾病中的价值:一项系统综述
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Aug 5;27:200483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200483. eCollection 2025 Dec.