• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10 g 单丝用于印度人群中糖尿病周围神经病变临床筛查的准确性。

The accuracy of 10 g monofilament use for clinical screening of diabetes peripheral neuropathy among Indian population.

机构信息

Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297110. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0297110
PMID:38394307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10890773/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the diagnostic accuracy of the 10g monofilament to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in India. The study further assessed the effect of physical activity, footwear use, and occupation on the outcome.

METHODS

Non-probabilistic purposive sampling was used to recruit patients with T2DM to assess the diagnostic utility of the 10 g monofilament. 160 participants were recruited divided into 4 groups. Each group consisted of 40 participants with 20 under each category described as "Physical Worker Vs Non- physical worker" (n = 40), "Barefoot Vs Footwear" (n = 40), "Use of Slipper at Home Vs No-slippers use at home" (n = 40), "Agriculture Vs Non- agriculture" (n = 40). 10 g monofilament was used to detect the presence of protective sensation towards screening of DPN against biothesiometer (Vibration Pressure Threshold).

RESULTS

The area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was 0.6 for identifying DPN using the 10 g monofilament. Physical work (p = 0.04), footwear (p = 0.04), slipper use at home (p = 0.02) and occupation (p = 0.02) impacted on the diagnostic utility of the 10g monofilament.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the 10 g monofilament has limited accuracy for detecting DPN in the Indian population and this is further affected by occupation, socioeconomic and religious practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验 10g 单丝检测印度糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的诊断准确性。本研究进一步评估了身体活动、穿鞋和职业对结果的影响。

方法

采用非概率目的性抽样招募 T2DM 患者,评估 10g 单丝的诊断效用。招募了 160 名参与者,分为 4 组。每组 40 人,分为“体力劳动者与非体力劳动者”(n=40)、“赤脚与穿鞋”(n=40)、“在家穿拖鞋与不穿拖鞋”(n=40)和“农业与非农业”(n=40)。使用 10g 单丝检测保护性感觉,筛查 DPN 对抗生物测振仪(振动压力阈值)。

结果

ROC(接受者操作特征)曲线下面积为 0.6,表明 10g 单丝可用于识别 DPN。体力劳动(p=0.04)、穿鞋(p=0.04)、在家穿拖鞋(p=0.02)和职业(p=0.02)影响 10g 单丝的诊断效用。

结论

本研究表明,10g 单丝在检测印度人群 DPN 方面准确性有限,且受职业、社会经济和宗教实践的影响。

相似文献

1
The accuracy of 10 g monofilament use for clinical screening of diabetes peripheral neuropathy among Indian population.10 g 单丝用于印度人群中糖尿病周围神经病变临床筛查的准确性。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297110. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation of Neuropad in the Assessment of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Versus the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, 10g Monofilament Application and Biothesiometer Measurement.验证 Neuropad 在评估糖尿病患者周围性糖尿病神经病变方面与密歇根神经病变筛查工具、10g 单丝应用和生物感觉计测量的对比。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(5):517-522. doi: 10.2174/1570161117666190723155324.
3
A prospective study of prevalence and association of peripheral neuropathy in Indian patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.一项关于印度新诊断2型糖尿病患者周围神经病变患病率及相关性的前瞻性研究。
J Postgrad Med. 2014 Jul-Sep;60(3):270-5. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.138750.
4
Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of Vibrasense compared to a biothesiometer and nerve conduction study for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy.评估 Vibrasense 与生物震感阈定量计和神经传导研究相比在筛查糖尿病周围神经病变中的诊断准确性。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Sep 28;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00667-3.
5
SUDOSCAN in Combination with the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Is an Effective Tool for Screening Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.SUDOSCAN 联合密歇根神经病变筛查工具是筛查糖尿病周围神经病变的有效工具。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Mar;46(2):319-326. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0014. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Prediction of incident diabetic neuropathy using the monofilament examination: a 4-year prospective study.使用单丝检查预测新发糖尿病性周围神经病:一项 4 年前瞻性研究。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1549-54. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1835. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
7
Abnormal vibration perception threshold alters the gait features in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.异常振动感知阈值改变 2 型糖尿病患者的步态特征。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;13:1092764. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1092764. eCollection 2022.
8
Non-invasive assessment of vibration perception and protective sensation in people with diabetes mellitus: inter- and intra-rater reliability.糖尿病患者振动感知和保护觉的无创评估:观察者间和观察者内可靠性。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jan 16;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-0371-9. eCollection 2020.
9
Mobile phone generated vibrations used to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy.利用手机产生的震动来检测糖尿病性周围神经病变。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):281-284. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
10
Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test.使用叩击音叉试验对糖尿病周围神经病变进行定量评估。
Endocr Pract. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):5-10. doi: 10.4158/EP.13.1.5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, amputation, and quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者周围神经病变、截肢和生活质量的患病率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 23;14(1):14430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65495-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the 10 g monofilament fit for purpose for diagnosing DPN?10克单丝用于诊断糖尿病性周围神经病是否适用?
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003773.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of the 5.07 monofilament test for diabetes polyneuropathy: influence of age, sex, neuropathic pain and neuropathy severity.5.07 单丝试验诊断糖尿病周围神经病的准确性:年龄、性别、神经病理性疼痛和神经病变严重程度的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003545.
3
Effectiveness of Semmes Weinstein 10 gm monofilament in diabetic peripheral neuropathy taking nerve conduction and autonomic function study as reference tests.
以神经传导和自主神经功能研究作为参考测试,评估Semmes Weinstein 10克单丝在糖尿病周围神经病变中的有效性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Oct;11(10):6204-6208. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_195_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Gold Standard for Diagnosis of DPN.糖尿病周围神经病变诊断的金标准。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 26;12:719356. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.719356. eCollection 2021.
5
Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India: A systematic review (1994-2018).印度 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的患病率:系统评价(1994-2018 年)。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
Non-invasive assessment of vibration perception and protective sensation in people with diabetes mellitus: inter- and intra-rater reliability.糖尿病患者振动感知和保护觉的无创评估:观察者间和观察者内可靠性。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jan 16;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-0371-9. eCollection 2020.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单丝试验检测糖尿病周围神经病变的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:8787261. doi: 10.1155/2017/8787261. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: resource utilization and burden of illness.糖尿病周围神经病变:资源利用与疾病负担
J Med Econ. 2014 Sep;17(9):637-45. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.928639. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
9
Footwear interventions: a review of their sensorimotor and mechanical effects on balance performance and gait in older adults.鞋类干预措施:对老年人平衡能力和步态的感觉运动及力学影响的综述
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec;103(6):516-33. doi: 10.7547/1030516.
10
Quantitative vibration perception threshold in assessing diabetic neuropathy: is the cut-off value lower for Indian subjects? [Q-VADIS Study].评估糖尿病性神经病变时的定量振动觉阈值:印度受试者的临界值是否更低?[Q-VADIS研究]
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 27.