Ott Sascha, Müller-Wirtz Lukas M, Sertcakacilar Gokhan, Tire Yasin, Turan Alparslan
Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité-Medical Heart Center of Charité and German Heart Institute Berlin, Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 15;13(4):1104. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041104.
Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians' analgesic portfolios.
包括区域麻醉技术在内的多模式镇痛策略已被证明有助于减少围手术期阿片类药物的使用及相关副作用。因此,那些所谓的多模式方法得到推荐,并已成为围手术期医学的标准做法。然而,在大多数重症监护病房(ICU)中,基于阿片类药物的单模式镇痛策略仍是护理标准。由于重症患者往往担心可能出现的并发症,尤其是与神经轴区域麻醉技术相关的并发症,因此指导在ICU应用区域麻醉的证据很少。然而,基于阿片类药物的镇痛方案往往对胸壁和腹壁镇痛的效果不佳。本综述总结了现有证据,并推荐外周区域镇痛方法,作为重症监护医生镇痛方法中的重要补充。