Suppr超能文献

动力锁定钢板与多枚松质骨螺钉固定囊内股骨颈骨折的比较:基于患者报告结局指标的长期结果及生活质量评估

Dynamic Locking Plate versus Multiple Cancellous Screws for the Fixation of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures: Long-Term Results and Quality-Of-Life Assessment Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

作者信息

Krupik Yoav, Haziza Sagie, Thein Ran

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 5265601, Israel.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, University Hospital, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 16;13(4):1123. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041123.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes and quality-of-life measures for two fixation methods in the setting of displaced femoral neck fractures. The two groups included fixation with multiple cancellous screws (group 1) and telescopic femoral neck screws and a small locking plate device (Targon FN) (group 2). Patients underwent reduction and internal fixation with either multiple cancellous screws or the Targon FN device from March 2000 to January 2012. Failure endpoints included nonunion, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and revision surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures included chronic pain, ability to ambulate, and the use of ambulation assistive devices. Statistical analysis demonstrated a statistically significant lower rate of non-union and overall complication in the Targon FN group ( value < 0.001 and value = 0.005, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that operative fixation with the Targon FN device decreased the odds ratio for overall complication by a factor of 0.34 ( = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 in patient-reported outcomes (chronic pain ( = 0.21), ability to ambulate ( = 0.07), and the use of an ambulation assistive device ( = 0.07)). When compared to traditional cancellous screw fixation of femoral neck fractures, the Targon FN device has significantly lower complication rates and equivalent patient-reported outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种固定方法在移位型股骨颈骨折中的长期临床疗效和生活质量指标。两组分别为多枚松质骨螺钉固定(第1组)和股骨颈 telescopic 螺钉联合小型锁定钢板装置(Targon FN)固定(第2组)。2000年3月至2012年1月期间,患者接受了多枚松质骨螺钉或Targon FN装置的复位内固定治疗。失败终点包括骨不连、股骨头坏死和翻修手术。患者报告的结局指标包括慢性疼痛、行走能力以及行走辅助装置的使用情况。统计分析表明,Targon FN组的骨不连发生率和总体并发症发生率在统计学上显著较低(分别为 值<0.001和 值=0.005)。逻辑回归分析显示,使用Targon FN装置进行手术固定使总体并发症的比值比降低了0.34倍( =0.02)。在患者报告的结局方面(慢性疼痛( =0.21)、行走能力( =0.07)和行走辅助装置的使用情况( =0.07)),第1组和第2组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。与传统的松质骨螺钉固定股骨颈骨折相比,Targon FN装置的并发症发生率显著更低,且患者报告的结局相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bb/10888707/89bfe0552452/jcm-13-01123-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验