Othman Yasser Ahmed, Khalefa Abdelrahman Hafez, Ahmed Islam Mohammed, Ahmed Khalaf Fathy Elsayed
Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 18;26(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09019-7.
Managing femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults remains a significant clinical dilemma. No single internal fixation method has demonstrated clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of FNFs in young adults treated with femoral neck locking plate (FNLP) or conventional partially-threaded 6.5 mm multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCCS).
A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) study was conducted on 74 patients to assess FNLP and MCCS in management of FNFs in young adults in Sohag university hospital between October 2022 and October 2024. The outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), weight-bearing timelines, radiographic union times, and complication rates.
FNLP demonstrated superior functional outcomes with significantly higher HHS scores compared to MCCS. Patients treated with FNLP achieved earlier partial and full weight-bearing (p <.001) and faster radiographic union times (p =.012), indicating better biomechanical stability. MCCS had a significantly shorter operative time at (49.3 ± 3.5 min) compared to the FNLP group at (62.3 ± 9.9 min), (p =.042). Complication rates, including femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis, and infection, were comparable between the two groups.
FNLP is a more effective fixation method for young adults with FNFs, offering faster functional recovery and improved radiographic outcomes. MCCS demonstrated significant shorter operative time which is a potential advantage especially in resources-constrained settings. Complication rates were similar between FNLP and MCCS, making MCCS a viable option in selected cases based on fracture severity, surgical expertise, and resources availability.
Level II therapeutic: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
The trial was retrospectively registered at 27 November, 2023 at www.
gov (Trial Registration Number: NCT06162637).
年轻成人股骨颈骨折(FNFs)的治疗仍是一个重大的临床难题。尚无单一的内固定方法显示出明显优势。本研究旨在比较采用股骨颈锁定钢板(FNLP)或传统的6.5毫米部分螺纹多枚空心松质骨螺钉(MCCS)治疗的年轻成人FNFs的临床和影像学结果。
2022年10月至2024年10月期间,在索哈格大学医院对74例患者进行了一项随机对照临床试验(RCT),以评估FNLP和MCCS在年轻成人FNFs治疗中的效果。结果包括Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、负重时间线、影像学愈合时间和并发症发生率。
与MCCS相比,FNLP显示出更好的功能结果,HHS评分显著更高。接受FNLP治疗的患者实现了更早的部分负重和完全负重(p <.001)以及更快的影像学愈合时间(p = 0.012),表明生物力学稳定性更好。与FNLP组(62.3±9.9分钟)相比,MCCS的手术时间显著更短,为(49.3±3.5分钟),(p = 0.042)。两组的并发症发生率,包括股骨颈缩短、缺血性坏死和感染,相当。
对于年轻成人FNFs,FNLP是一种更有效的固定方法,能实现更快的功能恢复和改善影像学结果。MCCS的手术时间显著更短,这是一个潜在优势, 特别是在资源有限的环境中。FNLP和MCCS的并发症发生率相似,这使得MCCS在根据骨折严重程度、手术专业知识和资源可用性选择的病例中成为一个可行的选择。
二级治疗性:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
该试验于2023年11月27日在www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov上进行回顾性注册(试验注册号:NCT06162637)。