Ghiselli Sara, Pizzol Erica, Vincenti Vincenzo, Fabrizi Enrico, Salsi Daria, Cuda Domenico
Department of Otolaryngology, AUSL Piacenza, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Department of Otolaryngology and Otoneurosurgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1134. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041134.
It is known that subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) need to exert more listening effort to achieve adequate speech recognition compared to normal hearing subjects. One tool for assessing listening effort is pupillometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive directional microphones in reducing listening effort for CI recipients.
We evaluated listening in noise and listening effort degree (by pupillometry) in eight bimodal subjects with three types of CI microphones and in three sound configurations.
We found a correlation only between sound configurations and listening in noise score (-value 0.0095). The evaluation of the microphone types shows worse scores in listening in noise with Opti Omni (+3.15 dB SNR) microphone than with Split Dir (+1.89 dB SNR) and Speech Omni (+1.43 dB SNR). No correlation was found between microphones and sound configurations and within the pupillometric data.
Different types of microphones have different effects on the listening of CI patients. The difference in the orientation of the sound source is a factor that has an impact on the listening effort results. However, the pupillometry measurements do not significantly correlate with the different microphone types.
众所周知,与听力正常的受试者相比,接受人工耳蜗植入(CI)的受试者需要付出更多的听力努力才能获得足够的言语识别能力。评估听力努力的一种工具是瞳孔测量法。本研究的目的是评估自适应定向麦克风在降低CI接受者听力努力方面的有效性。
我们评估了八名双模式受试者在三种类型的CI麦克风和三种声音配置下的噪声环境下听力和听力努力程度(通过瞳孔测量法)。
我们仅发现声音配置与噪声环境下听力得分之间存在相关性(-值0.0095)。对麦克风类型的评估显示,使用Opti Omni(+3.15 dB SNR)麦克风时在噪声环境下听力得分比使用Split Dir(+1.89 dB SNR)和Speech Omni(+1.43 dB SNR)时更差。在麦克风与声音配置之间以及瞳孔测量数据中未发现相关性。
不同类型的麦克风对CI患者的听力有不同影响。声源方向的差异是影响听力努力结果的一个因素。然而,瞳孔测量结果与不同的麦克风类型没有显著相关性。