• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层折叠、阶梯式减张缝合技术及瘢痕最小化评估。

Split-level folding, step-type tension-relieving suture technique, and the evaluation on scar minimization.

机构信息

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Western Theater Air Force Hospital of PLA, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Jun;23(6):2199-2208. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16236. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1111/jocd.16236
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevailing tension-reducing suture methods have a spectrum of issues. This study presents a straightforward yet highly efficacious suture technique known as the Split-level Folding, Step-type Tension-relieving Suture technique, which could play a pivotal role in preempting incisional scarring.

AIMS

To introduce Split-level Folding, Step-type Tension-relieving Suture technique and assess its effect on scar minimization.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 64 patients who underwent treatment utilizing the proposed suturing methodology. Assessment parameters included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), scar width, complications, and all evaluated at 6- and 12-month postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, the POSAS and VSS scores in the normal suture group (32.58 ± 5.43, 3.58 ± 1.39) were considerably higher than the step-type suture group (29.75 ± 3.56, p = 0.0007; 2.78 ± 1.17, p = 0.0006). Moreover, the step-type suture group showcased a significantly narrower average incision scar width (1.62 ± 0.36) than the normal suture group (1.87 ± 0.42, p = 0.0004). This novel tension-relieving suture technique that effectively circumvents the occurrence of persistent localized eversion and other complications often associated with traditional tension-relieving sutures.

CONCLUSIONS

The Split-level Folding, Step-type Tension-relieving Suture technique emerges as a highly promising option for averting incisional scarring. This suture method works well for incisions on the chest, back, and extremities, resulting in significantly better long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

现有的减张缝合方法存在一系列问题。本研究提出了一种简单而高效的缝合技术,称为分层折叠、阶梯式减张缝合技术,它在预防切口瘢痕方面可能发挥关键作用。

目的

介绍分层折叠、阶梯式减张缝合技术,并评估其对减少瘢痕的效果。

方法

对 64 例采用提出的缝合方法治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。评估参数包括患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)、温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)、瘢痕宽度、并发症,并在术后 6 个月和 12 个月进行评估。

结果

在 12 个月的随访中,普通缝线组(32.58±5.43,3.58±1.39)的 POSAS 和 VSS 评分明显高于阶梯式缝线组(29.75±3.56,p=0.0007;2.78±1.17,p=0.0006)。此外,阶梯式缝线组的切口瘢痕平均宽度(1.62±0.36)显著小于普通缝线组(1.87±0.42,p=0.0004)。这种新型的减张缝合技术有效地避免了传统减张缝合线常出现的持续局部外翻和其他并发症。

结论

分层折叠、阶梯式减张缝合技术是一种很有前途的避免切口瘢痕形成的方法。这种缝线方法适用于胸部、背部和四肢的切口,可获得明显更好的长期效果。

相似文献

1
Split-level folding, step-type tension-relieving suture technique, and the evaluation on scar minimization.分层折叠、阶梯式减张缝合技术及瘢痕最小化评估。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Jun;23(6):2199-2208. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16236. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Modified Buried Vertical Mattress Suture Versus Buried Intradermal Suture: A Prospective Split-Scar Study.改良埋置垂直褥式缝合与埋置皮内缝合:一项前瞻性双切口研究
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):e75-e80. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002642.
3
[Clinical effect of Zhang's super tension-relieving suture for high-tension wound closure].张氏超张力缓解缝合法用于高张力伤口闭合的临床效果
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 May 20;36(5):339-345. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200314-00163.
4
Using Zhang's supertension-relieving suture technique with slowly-absorbable barbed sutures in the management of pathological scars: a multicenter retrospective study.使用张氏超减张缝线技术结合可缓慢吸收的倒刺缝线治疗病理性瘢痕:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Burns Trauma. 2023 Jun 15;11:tkad026. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad026. eCollection 2023.
5
Application and effect of tension-reducing suture in surgical treatment of hypertrophic scar.减张缝合在肥厚性瘢痕手术治疗中的应用及效果
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02390-7.
6
Set-back versus buried vertical mattress suturing: results of a randomized blinded trial.后移与埋没垂直褥式缝合的比较:一项随机盲法试验的结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
7
Interrupted subcuticular suture spacing during linear wound closures and the effect on wound cosmesis: a randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial.间断皮下缝合间距对线性伤口愈合美容效果的影响:一项随机评估者盲法、劈开伤口的比较有效性试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Sep;187(3):318-323. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21625. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
8
Dermal suture only versus layered closure: A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial.单纯皮内缝合与分层缝合的比较:一项随机、分割伤口的有效性比较试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec;81(6):1346-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
9
A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.一项比较甲状腺切除术后皮钉和皮内缝合对术后瘢痕影响的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Does wound eversion improve cosmetic outcome?: Results of a randomized, split-scar, comparative trial.伤口外翻是否能改善美容效果?一项随机、双切口、对照试验的结果
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.032. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress in tension-relieving suturing surgery: revolutionary surgical techniques and patient prognosis evaluation methods.张力缓解缝合手术的进展:革命性的手术技术和患者预后评估方法。
Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1587582. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1587582. eCollection 2025.