Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰体尾腺癌 - 技术要点及手术结果分析。

Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas - technical considerations with analysis of surgical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Osiedle Zlotej Jesieni 1, 31-826, Cracow, Poland.

Department of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 24;409(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03265-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to establish whether laparoscopic RAMPS (L-RAMPS) is a safe procedure with better oncological outcomes compared to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) with splenectomy among patients with distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients who underwent L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy for resectable or borderline resectable PDAC of the body and tail. In this paper, we presented our technique of laparoscopic RAMPS and analyzed intraoperative and perioperative complications, oncological efficacy, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The study included 12 patients in the L-RAMPS group and 13 patients in the LDP with splenectomy. L-RAMPS was associated with significantly higher rates of R0 resection (91.7% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.027). There were no differences between the L-RAMPS and LDP with splenectomy groups in intraoperative blood loss (400 mL vs 400 mL, p = 0.783) and median operative time (250 min vs 220 min, p = 0.785). No differences were found in terms of perioperative complications, including the incidence of pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic RAMPS is a feasible and safe procedure. It provides higher radicality as compared with LDP with splenectomy, without increasing the risk of complications. Further studies are necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术加脾切除术(LDP+S)相比,腹腔镜远端胰腺筋膜间隙清扫术(L-RAMPS)在治疗可切除或交界可切除胰体尾导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中是否具有更好的肿瘤学结局,同时确保其手术的安全性。

方法

本研究为回顾性研究,纳入了接受 L-RAMPS 或 LDP+S 治疗的可切除或交界可切除胰体尾 PDAC 患者。本文介绍了我们的腹腔镜 RAMPS 技术,并分析了术中及围手术期并发症、肿瘤学疗效和长期生存情况。

结果

L-RAMPS 组 12 例患者,LDP+S 组 13 例患者。L-RAMPS 组的 R0 切除率显著高于 LDP+S 组(91.7% vs. 69.2%,p=0.027)。两组术中出血量(400 mL vs. 400 mL,p=0.783)和中位手术时间(250 min vs. 220 min,p=0.785)无差异。两组在围手术期并发症发生率,包括胰瘘发生率,也无差异。

结论

腹腔镜 RAMPS 是一种可行且安全的手术方式。与 LDP+S 相比,它能提供更高的根治性,且不增加并发症风险。需要进一步研究来评估其长期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验