• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌:单中心比较研究

Laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution comparative study.

作者信息

Huang Jing, Xiong Chaojie, Sheng Ye, Zhou Xinhua, Lu Cai-De, Cai Xiujun

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2021 Mar;10(3):1057-1066. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-56.

DOI:10.21037/gs-21-56
PMID:33842250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8033082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy is an effective and safe surgical modality for treating benign and borderline distal pancreatic tumors, but rarely for pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic and open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital between January 2014 and July 2018 were enrolled. 20 patients underwent laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and 31 patients received open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Postoperative and short-term outcomes of the two groups of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and overall postoperative morbidity were similar in the two groups (P>0.05). The laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy group lost less blood (252.5±198.3 472.6±428.0 mL, P=0.037) and had lower transfusion rates (10.0% 35.4%, P=0.041) than the open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy group. The laparoscopic group also had statistically significantly earlier passing of first flatus (2.5±0.8 3.2±1.2 days, P=0.028) and first oral intake (2.9±1.0 3.7±1.6 days, P=0.042). Furthermore, the rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (45.0% 32.3%) and overall complications (70.0% 74.2%) were not statistically difference between the two groups. The survival rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery were not statistically difference between the laparoscopic and open groups (94.4% 93.5, 67.0% 78.0%, and 50.2% 38.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy is feasible and safe for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜远端胰腺脾切除术是治疗良性及交界性远端胰腺肿瘤的一种有效且安全的手术方式,但很少用于治疗胰腺癌。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜与开放根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的可行性和安全性。

方法

纳入2014年1月至2018年7月在宁波市医疗中心李惠利医院接受根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术的51例胰腺癌患者。20例行腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术,31例行开放根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术。分析两组患者的术后及短期结局。

结果

两组患者的平均手术时间、术后住院时间及总体术后发病率相似(P>0.05)。腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术组的失血量(252.5±198.3对472.6±428.0 mL,P=0.037)和输血率(10.0%对35.4%,P=0.041)均低于开放根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术组。腹腔镜组首次排气时间(2.5±0.8对3.2±1.2天,P=0.028)和首次经口进食时间(2.9±1.0对3.7±1.6天,P=0.042)在统计学上也显著更早。此外,两组术后胰瘘发生率(45.0%对32.3%)和总体并发症发生率(70.0%对74.2%)无统计学差异。腹腔镜组与开放组术后6个月、1年和2年的生存率无统计学差异(分别为94.4%对93.5%、67.0%对78.0%、50.2%对38.3%)。

结论

本研究结果表明,腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰腺脾切除术治疗胰腺癌是可行且安全的。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution comparative study.腹腔镜与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌:单中心比较研究
Gland Surg. 2021 Mar;10(3):1057-1066. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-56.
2
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach.经屈氏韧带入路腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4836-4837. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5561-6. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
3
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.腹腔镜顺行模块化胰脾切除术
J Vis Surg. 2016 Jul 22;2:122. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.07.07. eCollection 2016.
4
Laparoscopic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy with Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: Tips and Tricks.腹腔镜下根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术联合血管切除治疗胰腺癌:技巧与窍门。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Dec;24(12):2896-2902. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04695-3. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in selected early-stage left-sided pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching study.评价腹腔镜根治性顺行模块胰脾切除术治疗选择性早期左侧胰腺癌的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3578-3589. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10868-x. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Feasibility of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) as a standard treatment for distal resectable pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜根治性顺行模块胰脾切除术(RAMPS)作为可切除远端胰腺癌标准治疗的可行性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 30;408(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02942-0.
7
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: preliminary experience with 10 cases.腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:10 例初步经验。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 10;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01090-w.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jul;103:106676. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106676. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes.单机构开展腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗左侧胰腺癌的初步经验:技术要点与肿瘤学结局
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0200-z.
10
Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study.微创与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰腺导管腺癌的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3763-3773. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07938-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis and survival analysis of open versus minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性与微创根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术治疗胰腺癌的比较分析和生存分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;14:1513520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1513520. eCollection 2024.
2
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.机器人手术、腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗非转移性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(pNETs):一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 22;13(21):6303. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216303.
3
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas - technical considerations with analysis of surgical outcomes.腹腔镜根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术(RAMPS)治疗胰体尾腺癌 - 技术要点及手术结果分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 24;409(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03265-4.
4
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Meta-Analysis.微创与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Jan;46(1):235-245. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06328-5. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acta Chir Belg. 2018 Oct;118(5):278-286. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1492212. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection.腹腔镜与开腹胰体尾切除术的肿瘤学结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):578-586. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10747. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
3
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Provides Oncologic Outcomes and Overall Survival Identical to Open Distal Pancreatectomy.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗癌症的肿瘤学结果和总体生存率与开腹胰体尾切除术相同。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Oct;21(10):1620-1625. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3506-y. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺癌安全有效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5633-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺腺癌
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1477-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3412-6.
7
Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching.使用倾向评分匹配法对腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术的多中心比较研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):731-6. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.268. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺良恶性病变的系统评价和荟萃分析:是时候进行随机对照试验了。
Surgery. 2015 Jan;157(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081.
9
Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.远端胰腺切除术:单一机构在开放、腹腔镜及机器人手术入路方面的经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jan;220(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术:单机构比较研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov 5;12:327. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-327.