Suppr超能文献

主要温室作物的能源、经济和环境(3E)评估:MFCA-LCA 方法。

Energy, economic, and environmental (3E) assessment of the major greenhouse crops: MFCA-LCA approach.

机构信息

Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Malayer University, Malayer, Hamadan, Iran.

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(14):21894-21912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32576-8. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

Abstract

In order to develop sustainable production of greenhouse crops, the economic, energy, and environmental aspects of production should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic, energy, and environmental (3E) sustainability of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper production in greenhouses by performing material flow cost accounting (MFCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) material and methods. Calculating the economic and energy value of losses in agricultural sustainability assessment studies is not common. Using the LCA method alone does not allow us to calculate the monetary and energy value of waste. If this method is used simultaneously with MFCA, this gap will be filled. The system boundary for LCA was from cradle to farm, and for MFCA, foreground processes were considered. The production of each crop was compared at the level of 1000 m during 1 year. Data were collected through questionnaire-based interviews. The gross value of production for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 8982, 16387, and 17610 $/1000 m, respectively. The negative production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were 702, 718, and 449 $/1000 m, respectively. The benefit-to-cost ratio in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 2.8, 5.17, and 5.8, respectively. The economic productivity in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated at 10.25, 7, and 4.4 kg/$. Labor cost was the main cost in the production of all three crops. The total input energy for the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was estimated to be 99.4, 123.1, and 164.6 GJ/1000 m, respectively. Negative products in the production of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper were obtained at - 24.2, - 23.9, and - 13.5 GJ/1000 m, respectively. The energy productivity of cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper was calculated as 0.23, 0.26, and 0.08 kg/MJ, respectively. The specific energy indices were 4.32, 3.79, and 12.20 MJ/kg for cucumber, tomato, and bell pepper, respectively. The energy ratio in the production of tomato (0.02) was higher than bell pepper (- 0.02) and cucumber (- 0.06). From the perspective of energy, electricity was recognized as the hotspot for the production of three crops. Global warming (GWP100a), ozone layer depletion (ODP), acidification (AC), and eutrophication (EP) indices were calculated for all three crops. Tomato production was ranked first in all impact categories. On-farm emissions and electricity consumption were identified as environmental hotspots. The subsidized price of electricity, natural gas, and chemical fertilizers has led to their excessive use in the production of greenhouse plants. It can be concluded that bell pepper has the best performance from an economic point of view. However, its production is not justified in terms of energy. Tomato was ranked first in terms of energy, and cucumber was ranked first in terms of low environmental impacts. The production of these plants with energy and chemical fertilizer subsidies is currently cost-effective. If the prices are corrected, the production of these plants will face serious challenges. Producing electricity from sunlight and mechanizing production processes can be a solution to these challenges.

摘要

为了实现温室作物的可持续生产,应该考虑生产的经济、能源和环境方面。本研究的目的是通过进行物质流成本核算(MFCA)和生命周期评估(LCA)物质和方法,评估黄瓜、番茄和甜椒在温室中的经济、能源和环境(3E)可持续性。在农业可持续性评估研究中,计算经济和能源损失的经济和能源价值并不常见。单独使用 LCA 方法无法计算废物的货币和能源价值。如果同时使用 MFCA,这个差距将被填补。LCA 的系统边界是从摇篮到农场,而对于 MFCA,考虑了前景区过程。在 1 年内,以 1000m 的水平比较了每种作物的生产。数据通过基于问卷的访谈收集。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的毛产值分别为 8982、16387 和 17610 美元/1000m。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的负产值分别为 702、718 和 449 美元/1000m。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的收益成本比分别为 2.8、5.17 和 5.8。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的经济生产力分别计算为 10.25、7 和 4.4kg/$。劳动力成本是所有三种作物生产的主要成本。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的总输入能源估计分别为 99.4、123.1 和 164.6 GJ/1000m。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的负产品分别为-24.2、-23.9 和-13.5 GJ/1000m。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的能源生产力分别计算为 0.23、0.26 和 0.08kg/MJ。黄瓜、番茄和甜椒的具体能源指数分别为 4.32、3.79 和 12.20MJ/kg。从能源角度看,番茄(0.02)的能源比甜椒(-0.02)和黄瓜(-0.06)更高。从能源角度看,番茄的生产在所有影响类别中均排名第一。对所有三种作物都计算了全球变暖(GWP100a)、臭氧消耗(ODP)、酸化(AC)和富营养化(EP)指数。番茄生产在所有影响类别中均排名第一。农场排放和电力消耗被确定为环境热点。电力、天然气和化肥的补贴价格导致它们在温室植物生产中的过度使用。可以得出结论,从经济角度来看,甜椒表现最佳。然而,就能源而言,其生产是不合理的。番茄在能源方面排名第一,黄瓜在低环境影响方面排名第一。这些植物的生产目前具有成本效益。如果价格得到修正,这些植物的生产将面临严峻挑战。利用阳光生产电力和实现生产过程机械化可以是解决这些挑战的一种方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验