Gaur Sonia, Troost Jonathan P, Fung Christopher M, Breeden Joshua, Barkmeier Daniel, Shankar Prasad R, Khalatbari Shokoufeh, Davenport Matthew S
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jun;49(6):2145-2154. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04244-5. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
Radiologists with diverse training, specialization, and habits interpret imaging in the Emergency Department. It is necessary to understand if their variation predicts differential value. The purpose of this study was to determine whether attending radiologist variation predicts major clinical outcomes in adult Emergency Department patients imaged with ultrasound for right upper quadrant pain.
Consecutive ED patients imaged with ultrasound for RUQ pain from 10/8/2016 to 8/10/2022 were included (N = 7097). The primary outcome was prediction of hospital admission by signing attending radiologist. Secondary outcomes included: ED and hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, 30-day re-presentation rate, subspecialty consultation, advanced imaging follow up (HIDA, MRI, CT), and intervention (ERCP, drainage or surgery). Sample size was determined a priori (detectable effect size: w = 0.06). Data were adjusted for demographic data, Elixhauser comorbidities, number of ED visits in prior year, clinical data, and system factors (38 covariates). P-values were corrected for multiple comparisons (false discovery rate-adjusted p-values).
The included ultrasounds were read by 35 radiologists (median exams/radiologist: 145 [74.5-241.5]). Signing radiologist did not predict hospitalization (p = 0.85), abdominopelvic surgery or intervention within 30 days, re-presentation to the Emergency Department within 30 days, or subspecialty consultation. Radiologist did predict difference in Emergency Department length of stay (p < 0.001) although this difference was small and imprecise. HIDA was mentioned variably by radiologists (range 0-19%, p < 0.001), and mention of HIDA in the ultrasound report increased 10-fold the odds of HIDA being performed in the next 72 h (odds ratio 10.4 [8.0-13.4], p < 0.001).
Radiologist variability did not predict meaningful outcome differences for patients with right upper quadrant pain undergoing ultrasound in the Emergency Department, but when radiologists mention HIDA in their reports, it predicts a 10-fold increase in the odds a HIDA is performed. Radiologists are relied on for interpretation that shapes subsequent patient care, and it is important to consider how radiologist variability can influence both outcome and resource utilization.
接受过不同培训、具有不同专业特长和习惯的放射科医生在急诊科解读影像。有必要了解他们的差异是否预示着不同的价值。本研究的目的是确定主治放射科医生的差异是否能预测因右上腹疼痛接受超声检查的成年急诊科患者的主要临床结局。
纳入2016年10月8日至2022年8月10日期间因右上腹疼痛接受超声检查的连续急诊患者(N = 7097)。主要结局是主治放射科医生对住院的预测。次要结局包括:急诊科和住院时间(LOS)、30天死亡率、30天再次就诊率、专科会诊、高级影像随访(HIDA、MRI、CT)以及干预措施(ERCP、引流或手术)。样本量事先确定(可检测效应大小:w = 0.06)。对数据进行了人口统计学数据、Elixhauser共病、前一年急诊就诊次数、临床数据和系统因素(38个协变量)的校正。对P值进行了多重比较校正(错误发现率调整后的P值)。
纳入的超声检查由35名放射科医生解读(每位放射科医生的检查中位数:145 [74.5 - 241.5])。主治放射科医生无法预测住院情况(p = 0.85)、30天内的腹部盆腔手术或干预措施、30天内再次到急诊科就诊或专科会诊。放射科医生确实预测了急诊科住院时间的差异(p < 0.001),尽管这种差异很小且不精确。放射科医生对HIDA的提及存在差异(范围为0 - 19%,p < 0.001),超声报告中提及HIDA会使在接下来72小时内进行HIDA检查的几率增加10倍(优势比10.4 [8.0 - 13.4],p < 0.001)。
放射科医生的差异并不能预测急诊科因右上腹疼痛接受超声检查患者的有意义的结局差异,但当放射科医生在报告中提及HIDA时,这预示着进行HIDA检查的几率会增加10倍。放射科医生的解读会影响后续患者护理,因此了解放射科医生的差异如何影响结局和资源利用非常重要。