Suppr超能文献

比较不稳定的老年股骨转子间粉碎性骨折(AO 分型 A2)患者的短钉与中长钉:多中心(TRON 组)回顾性研究。

Comparing short vs. intermediate and long nails in elderly patients with unstable multifragmental femoral trochanteric fractures (AO type A2): Multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Injury. 2024 Apr;55(4):111420. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111420. Epub 2024 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unstable femoral trochanteric fractures (FTFs), especially Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/ the Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A2 fractures, which are multifragment fractures, occur in elderly individuals with osteoporosis and are associated with high mortality and complication rates due to prolonged immobilization. Longer nails (LNs) were developed to obtain superior fracture site stabilization in unstable FTFs. We hypothesized that the postoperative outcomes of elderly patients with unstable FTFs treated with LNs would be superior to those of patients treated with short nails (SNs), with fewer complications.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of SNs versus LNs in elderly patients with unstable FTFs. From the Trauma Research Group of our university (TRON) database, 1854 trochanteric fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2020 were extracted. A total of 174 patients>65 years of age with AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures were included in the present study. They were divided into the SN group and the LN group and matched for age and sex. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, survival rate, Parker Mobility Score (PMS), and numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, complications, and radiographic findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both groups included 67 patients with an average age of 87.32 years. The LN group had a longer operative time (76.52 min vs. 51.61 min, P < 0.001) and more blood loss (106.79 mL vs. 49.98 mL, P = 0.014) in comparison to the SN group. However, the 1-year survival rate, PMS, and NRS for pain did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the groups. The rates of complications, including screw cutout, nonunion, implant breakage, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and surgical site infections, were comparable. The radiographic findings, including the nail/canal ratio, progression of varus, and sliding distance, were also similar.

CONCLUSION

Although LNs are associated with longer operative times and increased blood loss, the overall outcomes and complication rates are comparable to those of SNs in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 type unstable FTFs. The use of LNs did not confer any distinct advantages for this specific type of fracture.

摘要

背景

不稳定股骨转子间骨折(FTFs),特别是 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/ the Orthopedic Trauma Association(AO/OTA)31-A2 型骨折,即多段骨折,发生在骨质疏松症的老年患者中,由于长期固定,死亡率和并发症发生率较高。长钉(LNs)的开发是为了在不稳定 FTFs 中获得更好的骨折部位稳定性。我们假设,用 LNs 治疗不稳定 FTFs 的老年患者的术后结果将优于用短钉(SNs)治疗的患者,并发症更少。

方法

这项多中心回顾性研究旨在比较 SNs 与 LNs 在治疗不稳定 FTFs 的老年患者中的结果。从我们大学的创伤研究组(TRON)数据库中提取了 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间治疗的 1854 例转子间骨折。本研究共纳入 174 例年龄>65 岁、AO/OTA 31-A2 型骨折的患者。将他们分为 SN 组和 LN 组,并按年龄和性别进行匹配。分析了手术时间、失血量、存活率、帕克活动评分(PMS)和疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)、并发症以及影像学发现等参数。

结果

两组均包括 67 例平均年龄为 87.32 岁的患者。与 SN 组相比,LN 组的手术时间更长(76.52 分钟比 51.61 分钟,P<0.001),失血量更多(106.79 毫升比 49.98 毫升,P=0.014)。然而,两组之间 1 年存活率、PMS 和疼痛的 NRS 差异无统计学意义。并发症发生率包括螺钉切出、骨不连、植入物断裂、股骨头坏死和手术部位感染,两组之间无差异。影像学发现,包括钉/管比、内翻进展和滑动距离,也相似。

结论

虽然 LNs 与较长的手术时间和更多的失血量相关,但在 AO/OTA 31-A2 型不稳定 FTFs 的老年患者中,总体结果和并发症发生率与 SNs 相当。对于这种特定类型的骨折,使用 LNs 并没有带来明显的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验