Crisco Joseph J, Henke Julia A, McDermott Daniel G, Badida Rohit, Morton Amy M, Kalshoven Josephine M, Moore Douglas C
Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
J Biomech. 2024 Mar;165:112013. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112013. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
Understanding the loads that occur across musculoskeletal joints is critical to advancing our understanding of joint function and pathology, implant design and testing, as well as model verification. Substantial work in these areas has occurred in the hip and knee but has not yet been undertaken in smaller joints, such as those in the wrist. The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a uniquely human articulation that is also a common site of osteoarthritis with unknown etiology. We present two potential designs for an instrumented trapezium implant and compare approaches to load calibration. Two instrumented trapezia designs were prototyped using strain gauge technology: Tube and Diaphragm. The Tube design is a well-established structure for sensing loads while the Diaphragm is novel. Each design was affixed to a 6-DOF load cell that was used as the reference. Loads were applied manually, and two calibration methods, supervised neural network (DEEP) and matrix algebra (MAT), were implemented. Bland-Altman 95% confidence interval for the limits of agreement (95% CI LOA) was used to assess accuracy. Overall, the DEEP calibration decreased 95% CI LOA compared with the MAT approach for both designs. The Diaphragm design outperformed the Tube design in measuring the primary load vector (joint compression). Importantly, the Diaphragm design permits the hermetic encapsulation of all electronics, which is not possible with the Tube design, given the small size of the trapezium. Substantial work remains before this device can be approved for implantation, but this work lays the foundation for further device development that will be required.
了解肌肉骨骼关节所承受的负荷对于深化我们对关节功能与病理、植入物设计与测试以及模型验证的理解至关重要。在髋关节和膝关节方面已开展了大量相关工作,但在诸如腕关节等较小关节上尚未进行。拇指腕掌(CMC)关节是人类特有的关节,也是病因不明的骨关节炎的常见发病部位。我们展示了两种用于带仪器的大多角骨植入物的潜在设计,并比较了负荷校准方法。使用应变片技术制作了两种带仪器的大多角骨设计原型:管状和隔膜式。管状设计是一种成熟的用于感测负荷的结构,而隔膜式设计则是新颖的。每种设计都固定在一个用作参考的六自由度测力传感器上。手动施加负荷,并实施了两种校准方法,即监督神经网络(DEEP)和矩阵代数(MAT)。使用一致性界限的布兰德 - 奥特曼95%置信区间(95% CI LOA)来评估准确性。总体而言,对于两种设计,与MAT方法相比,DEEP校准降低了95% CI LOA。在测量主要负荷向量(关节压缩)方面,隔膜式设计优于管状设计。重要的是,鉴于大多角骨尺寸较小,隔膜式设计允许对所有电子元件进行密封封装,而管状设计则无法做到这一点。在该装置被批准植入之前,仍有大量工作要做,但这项工作为后续所需的进一步装置开发奠定了基础。