• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中药足浴治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of chinese herbal foot bath for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Tong, Zhou Luolin, Liao Xinru, He Yuewen, Xu Ronglin, Luo Daihong

机构信息

First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Shenzhen Hospital (Longgang), Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2024 May;81:103029. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103029. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103029
PMID:38401689
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a prevalent condition with significant impacts on human health. Chinese herbal foot bath, a traditional Chinese medicine treatment, is believed to help manage hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of combining Chinese herbal foot bath with conventional treatment for hypertension.

METHODS

A thorough search across eight databases was conducted to identify relevant studies on Chinese herbal foot bath for hypertension. Randomized controlled trials examining the benefits and risks of using Chinese herbal foot bath combined with conventional treatment for hypertension were included. Blood pressure changes before and after the Chinese herbal foot bath were assessed, and outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional treatment, Chinese herbal foot bath combined with conventional treatment demonstrated greater effectiveness in reducing systolic blood pressure (MD 6.69, 95% CI: 5.86 to 7.53, p < 0.00001) and diastolic blood pressure (MD 5.83, 95% CI: 5.23 to 6.43, p < 0.00001), which reported fewer adverse effects.These studies commonly present issues such as inadequate randomization, lack of blinding, and absence of independent testing for the purity or potency of herbs.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis suggests that Chinese herbal foot bath combined with conventional treatment may effectively manage hypertension, with few adverse effects. However, high-quality clinical trials are still needed to confirm these findings due to methodological weaknesses in randomization, blinding, long-term follow-up, and independent testing for the purity and potency of herbs.

摘要

背景

高血压是一种普遍存在的疾病,对人类健康有重大影响。中药足浴作为一种中医疗法,被认为有助于控制高血压。

目的

本系统评价旨在评估中药足浴联合传统治疗对高血压的疗效。

方法

全面检索了8个数据库,以确定有关中药足浴治疗高血压的相关研究。纳入了考察中药足浴联合传统治疗高血压的益处和风险的随机对照试验。评估了中药足浴前后的血压变化,并使用Review Manager 5.3软件分析结果。使用GRADE工具评估证据的确定性。

结果

与传统治疗相比,中药足浴联合传统治疗在降低收缩压(MD 6.69,95%CI:5.86至7.53,p<0.00001)和舒张压(MD 5.83,95%CI:5.23至6.43,p<0.00001)方面显示出更大的效果,且不良反应较少。这些研究普遍存在随机化不足、缺乏盲法以及未对草药的纯度或效力进行独立检测等问题。

结论

荟萃分析表明,中药足浴联合传统治疗可能有效控制高血压,且不良反应较少。然而,由于随机化、盲法、长期随访以及草药纯度和效力独立检测方面的方法学缺陷,仍需要高质量的临床试验来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of chinese herbal foot bath for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中药足浴治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Complement Ther Med. 2024 May;81:103029. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103029. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Adding Chinese herbal medicine bath therapy to conventional therapies for psoriasis vulgaris: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.中药浴疗法联合常规疗法治疗寻常型银屑病的系统评价及 Meta 分析。
Phytomedicine. 2024 Jun;128:155381. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155381. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Chinese herbal medicine bath therapy for psoriasis vulgaris using topical calcipotriol as the comparator: A systematic review with meta-analysis and association rule analysis.中药浴疗法治疗寻常型银屑病对照外用卡泊三醇:系统评价与 Meta 分析及关联规则分析。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2024 Aug 10;330:118166. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118166. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Traditional chinese medicine injections with activating blood circulation, equivalent effect of anticoagulation or antiplatelet, for acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.活血化瘀类中药注射剂等效于抗凝或抗血小板治疗急性心肌梗死:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和Meta分析
Complement Ther Med. 2024 Jun;82:103039. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103039. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
5
Chinese herbal bath therapy for the treatment of uremic pruritus: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中药浴疗法治疗尿毒症瘙痒症的疗效评价:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 May 10;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2513-9.
6
The effects of Chinese herbal medicines for treating diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review of 49 randomized controlled trials.中药治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:49 项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Complement Ther Med. 2019 Jun;44:32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for patients with postmenopausal hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中药治疗绝经后高血压患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2019 Mar;141:481-500. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
Clinical evidence of three traditional Chinese medicine drugs and three herbal formulas for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese population.三种中药药物和三种中草药配方治疗 COVID-19 的临床证据:中国人群的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Integr Med. 2023 Sep;21(5):441-454. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
10
Single herbal medicine for diabetic retinopathy.用于治疗糖尿病视网膜病变的单一草药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD007939. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007939.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese herbal foot baths as a new strategy for diabetic foot with Wagner grade of 0 or 1: a meta-analysis and data mining.中药足浴作为瓦格纳分级为0或1级糖尿病足的一种新策略:一项荟萃分析和数据挖掘
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1594386. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1594386. eCollection 2025.