Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Insights Team, Health Innovation Network, London, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Oct 1;63(10):2721-2733. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae112.
This study evaluated the scale-up of a remote monitoring service, capturing monthly Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scores and patient-generated text messages, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; in remission or with low disease activity) attending routine outpatient clinics across six hospitals. We explored patients and staff experiences and implementation outcomes.
A pragmatic, mixed methods approach was used, with active patient involvement throughout. We undertook a rapid review, analysed service-level data, and conducted a patient survey and patient and staff interviews, informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) and Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) theoretical frameworks.
The review included 37 articles, covering themes of patient and clinician acceptability, engagement, feasibility and clinical impact. Service-level data (n = 202) showed high levels of patient engagement with the service. The patient survey (n = 155) showed patients felt the service was easy to use, had confidence in it and felt it improved access to care. Patient interview (n = 22) findings mirrored those of the survey. Motivating factors included increased responsiveness and ease of contact with clinical teams. Views from staff interviews (n = 16) were more mixed. Some implementation barriers were specific to roll-out sites. Prioritization of staff needs was emphasized.
Patients were positive about the service and engagement was high. Staff views and engagement were more mixed. Results suggest that equal levels of patient and staff engagement are required for sustainability. These findings further our understanding of the implementation challenges to scaling remote monitoring interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine care settings.
本研究评估了一项远程监测服务的扩展情况,该服务每月采集类风湿关节炎患者(处于缓解期或疾病活动度低)的疾病影响评分和患者生成的文本信息,这些患者在六家医院的常规门诊就诊。我们探讨了患者和工作人员的经验以及实施结果。
采用实用的混合方法,在整个过程中积极让患者参与。我们进行了快速审查,分析了服务层面的数据,并进行了患者调查以及患者和工作人员的访谈,这些研究受到了能力、机会、动机、行为(COM-B)和探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)理论框架的启发。
综述包括 37 篇文章,涵盖了患者和临床医生接受度、参与度、可行性和临床影响的主题。服务层面的数据(n=202)显示患者对该服务的参与度很高。患者调查(n=155)显示患者认为该服务易于使用,对其有信心,并认为该服务改善了获得医疗护理的机会。患者访谈(n=22)的调查结果与调查结果一致。激励因素包括提高响应能力和与临床团队联系的便利性。工作人员访谈(n=16)的观点更为复杂。一些实施障碍是特定于推出地点的。工作人员需求的优先级被强调。
患者对该服务持积极态度,参与度很高。工作人员的看法和参与度则更为复杂。结果表明,要实现可持续性,需要患者和工作人员的同等参与度。这些发现进一步了解了在常规护理环境中为类风湿关节炎患者扩展远程监测干预措施所面临的实施挑战。