• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球皮肤病学图谱项目指南(GUIDEMAP)——接触性皮炎临床实践指南方法学质量的系统评价

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)-A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines.

作者信息

van Zuuren Esther J, Arents Bernd W M, Vermeulen Sofieke, Schoones Jan W, Fedorowicz Zbys

机构信息

Dermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Jun;90(6):543-555. doi: 10.1111/cod.14530. Epub 2024 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1111/cod.14530
PMID:38403277
Abstract

The Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP) assesses the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for high-burden skin diseases. This review focuses on contact dermatitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier for CPGs published between 1 November 2018 and 1 November 2023. Prespecified guideline resources were hand searched. Two authors independently undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessments. Instruments used were the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Reporting Checklist, the U.S. Institute of Medicine's (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument and Lenzer's Red Flags. Twenty five CPGs were included, exhibiting heterogeneity in both the topics they addressed and their methodological quality. Whereas the CPGs on management of hand eczema from Denmark, Europe and the Netherlands scored best, most CPGs fell short of being clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence-based. Disclosure of conflicts of interest scored well, and areas needing improvement include 'strength and wording of recommendations', 'applicability', 'updating' and 'external review'. Adhering to AGREE II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) enhances methodological quality.

摘要

全球皮肤病学图谱项目临床实践指南(GUIDEMAP)评估了高负担皮肤病临床实践指南(CPG)的方法学质量。本综述聚焦于接触性皮炎。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、Emcare、Epistemonikos、PsycINFO和学术搜索高级版,以查找2018年11月1日至2023年11月1日期间发表的CPG。还对手工检索了预先指定的指南资源。两位作者独立进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估。使用的工具包括《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II报告清单、美国医学研究所(IOM)的可信度标准、医疗保健研究与质量局的国家指南交换中心对可信标准的遵守程度(NEATS)工具以及Lenzer的警示信号。纳入了25份CPG,它们在涉及的主题和方法学质量方面均表现出异质性。丹麦、欧洲和荷兰关于手部湿疹管理的CPG得分最高,而大多数CPG在清晰度、无偏性、可信度和循证性方面都有所欠缺。利益冲突的披露得分较好,需要改进的方面包括“建议的力度和措辞”、“适用性”、“更新”和“外部审查”。遵循AGREE II和推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)可提高方法学质量。

相似文献

1
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)-A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines.全球皮肤病学图谱项目指南(GUIDEMAP)——接触性皮炎临床实践指南方法学质量的系统评价
Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Jun;90(6):543-555. doi: 10.1111/cod.14530. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
2
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP), a systematic review of atopic dermatitis clinical practice guidelines: are they clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence based (CUTE)?全球皮肤病学图谱项目(GUIDEMAP)中关于特应性皮炎临床实践指南的系统评价:这些指南是否清晰、无偏倚、可信且基于证据(CUTE)?
Br J Dermatol. 2022 May;186(5):792-802. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20972.
3
Systematic review and critical appraisal of psoriasis clinical practice guidelines: a Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP).系统性综述和关键评估银屑病临床实践指南:皮肤病学全球指南映射项目(GUIDEMAP)。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Aug;187(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21047. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP): a systematic review of alopecia areata clinical practice guidelines.全球皮肤病学图谱项目指南(GUIDEMAP):斑秃临床实践指南的系统评价
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2023 Feb 2;48(2):100-107. doi: 10.1093/ced/llac025.
5
Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Urticaria Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP).荨麻疹临床实践指南的系统评价和批判性评价:皮肤病学指南映射项目(GUIDEMAP)中的全球指南。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Oct;11(10):3213-3220.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.002. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
6
Developing and Testing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent of Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument.开发和测试医疗保健研究与质量机构的国家指南清理中心对值得信赖的标准(NEATS)工具的依从程度。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Apr 2;170(7):480-487. doi: 10.7326/M18-2950. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
7
Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines.骨质疏松症筛查:使用 AGREE II 工具和 IOM 可信指南标准对临床实践指南的质量和内容进行系统评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208251. eCollection 2018.
8
Quality and consistency of clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of food allergy and atopic dermatitis: Systematic review protocol.预防食物过敏和特应性皮炎临床实践指南的质量与一致性:系统评价方案
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Sep 12;15(9):100679. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100679. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP): a scoping review of dermatology clinical practice guidelines.全球皮肤病学绘图项目指南(GUIDEMAP):皮肤病临床实践指南的范围综述。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Oct;185(4):736-744. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20428. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
AGREE II assessments of recent acne treatment guidelines: how well do they reveal trustworthiness as defined by the U.S. Institute of Medicine criteria?AGREE II 对近期痤疮治疗指南的评估:它们在多大程度上符合美国医学研究所标准所定义的可信度?
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Dec;177(6):1716-1725. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15777. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissecting inequity: global systematic review of trauma clinical guidance.剖析不平等:创伤临床指南的全球系统评价
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Sep 5;10(Suppl 5):e001624. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001624. eCollection 2025.