Suppr超能文献

全球皮肤病学图谱项目指南(GUIDEMAP)——接触性皮炎临床实践指南方法学质量的系统评价

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)-A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines.

作者信息

van Zuuren Esther J, Arents Bernd W M, Vermeulen Sofieke, Schoones Jan W, Fedorowicz Zbys

机构信息

Dermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2024 Jun;90(6):543-555. doi: 10.1111/cod.14530. Epub 2024 Feb 25.

Abstract

The Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP) assesses the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for high-burden skin diseases. This review focuses on contact dermatitis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, Epistemonikos, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier for CPGs published between 1 November 2018 and 1 November 2023. Prespecified guideline resources were hand searched. Two authors independently undertook screening, data extraction and quality assessments. Instruments used were the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II Reporting Checklist, the U.S. Institute of Medicine's (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument and Lenzer's Red Flags. Twenty five CPGs were included, exhibiting heterogeneity in both the topics they addressed and their methodological quality. Whereas the CPGs on management of hand eczema from Denmark, Europe and the Netherlands scored best, most CPGs fell short of being clear, unbiased, trustworthy and evidence-based. Disclosure of conflicts of interest scored well, and areas needing improvement include 'strength and wording of recommendations', 'applicability', 'updating' and 'external review'. Adhering to AGREE II and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) enhances methodological quality.

摘要

全球皮肤病学图谱项目临床实践指南(GUIDEMAP)评估了高负担皮肤病临床实践指南(CPG)的方法学质量。本综述聚焦于接触性皮炎。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、Emcare、Epistemonikos、PsycINFO和学术搜索高级版,以查找2018年11月1日至2023年11月1日期间发表的CPG。还对手工检索了预先指定的指南资源。两位作者独立进行筛选、数据提取和质量评估。使用的工具包括《研究与评价指南评估》(AGREE)II报告清单、美国医学研究所(IOM)的可信度标准、医疗保健研究与质量局的国家指南交换中心对可信标准的遵守程度(NEATS)工具以及Lenzer的警示信号。纳入了25份CPG,它们在涉及的主题和方法学质量方面均表现出异质性。丹麦、欧洲和荷兰关于手部湿疹管理的CPG得分最高,而大多数CPG在清晰度、无偏性、可信度和循证性方面都有所欠缺。利益冲突的披露得分较好,需要改进的方面包括“建议的力度和措辞”、“适用性”、“更新”和“外部审查”。遵循AGREE II和推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)可提高方法学质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验