• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性传播感染伴侣服务在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行之前和期间在华盛顿州金县的结果。

Sexually Transmitted Infection Partner Services Outcomes Before and During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in King County, WA.

机构信息

From the University of Washington.

Public Health - Seattle & King County.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2024 Jul 1;51(7):445-451. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960
PMID:38403296
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic mitigation efforts resulted in reallocation of public health personnel, likely impacting provision of timely sexually transmitted infection partner services (PS). We describe PS outcomes before and during the pandemic in King County, WA.

METHODS

We examined PS outcomes for syphilis and gonorrhea cases diagnosed in 2019 and 3 periods in 2020 (pre-lockdown: January 1, 2020-March 23, 2020; lockdown: March 24, 2020-June 5, 2020; post-lockdown: June 6, 2020-December 31, 2020). We described changes over time in 3 PS outcomes: cases initiated, interviewed, and with named sex partners. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with Poisson regression comparing these outcomes in the 2020 periods with 2019.

RESULTS

Reported gonorrhea (4611 vs. 4179) and syphilis (665 vs. 586) cases declined from 2019 to 2020. In 2019, 60.7% of cases were initiated, compared with 42.1% before lockdown (aPR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70%-0.78%), 41.7% during lockdown (aPR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85), and 41.7% after lockdown (aPR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Among initiated cases, the proportion interviewed also seemed to drop in the 3 lockdown periods (52.4%, 41.0%, 44.1%) compared with 2019 (55.7%). However, in adjusted analyses, the prevalence of interview among case patients was only lower pre-lockdown (aPR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99), and higher during (aPR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20) and after (aPR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Interviewed patients named partners more often during (21.4%; aPR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and less often after lockdown (16.0%; aPR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.79), compared with 2019 (26.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results underscore the need for a trained public health worker reserve, and plans for deployment of existing workers and prioritization of cases to continue essential sexually transmitted infection public health activities during public health crises.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 大流行缓解措施导致公共卫生人员重新分配,可能会影响及时提供性传播感染伴侣服务 (PS)。我们描述了华盛顿州金县在大流行前后的 PS 结果。

方法

我们检查了 2019 年和 2020 年 3 个时期诊断出的梅毒和淋病病例的 PS 结果 (封锁前:2020 年 1 月 1 日至 3 月 23 日;封锁:2020 年 3 月 24 日至 6 月 5 日;封锁后:2020 年 6 月 6 日至 12 月 31 日)。我们描述了 3 个 PS 结果随时间的变化:开始治疗、接受采访和确定性伴侣。我们使用泊松回归比较了 2020 年期间与 2019 年期间的这些结果,并计算了调整后的患病率比 (aPR)。

结果

2019 年和 2020 年报告的淋病 (4611 例比 4179 例) 和梅毒 (665 例比 586 例) 病例减少。在 2019 年,有 60.7%的病例开始治疗,而封锁前为 42.1% (aPR,0.74;95%置信区间[CI],0.70%-0.78%),封锁期间为 41.7% (aPR,0.79;95% CI,0.73-0.85),封锁后为 41.7% (aPR,0.81;95% CI,0.77-0.85)。在开始治疗的病例中,接受采访的比例在 3 个封锁期间似乎也有所下降(52.4%、41.0%、44.1%),而 2019 年为 55.7%。然而,在调整后的分析中,病例患者接受采访的患病率仅在封锁前较低(aPR,0.91;95%CI,0.85-0.99),而在封锁期间和封锁后较高(aPR,1.10;95%CI,1.01-1.20)和(aPR,1.12;95%CI,1.06-1.19)。与 2019 年相比,接受采访的患者在封锁期间(21.4%;aPR,1.35;95%CI,1.05-1.74)更常命名性伴侣,而在封锁后较少(16.0%;aPR,0.63;95%CI,0.51-0.79)。

结论

这些结果强调了需要有训练有素的公共卫生工作者储备,并需要制定计划,部署现有工作人员,并对病例进行优先排序,以便在公共卫生危机期间继续开展基本的性传播感染公共卫生活动。

相似文献

1
Sexually Transmitted Infection Partner Services Outcomes Before and During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in King County, WA.性传播感染伴侣服务在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行之前和期间在华盛顿州金县的结果。
Sex Transm Dis. 2024 Jul 1;51(7):445-451. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001960. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
STI Testing and Rates of STI Diagnoses Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a US HIV Cohort.美国一个艾滋病毒队列中 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的性传播感染检测及性传播感染诊断率
Sex Transm Dis. 2025 May 1;52(5):304-309. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002124. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
3
Body Mass Index in Children Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间及前后儿童的体重指数
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519528. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19528.
4
Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒)的性伴侣通知策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 3;2013(10):CD002843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002843.pub2.
5
Comparison of outpatient attendance, cardiovascular risk management and cardiovascular health across preCOVID-19, during and postCOVID-19 periods: a prospective cohort study.2019年新冠疫情前、疫情期间及疫情后门诊就诊情况、心血管风险管理及心血管健康状况的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e092374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092374.
6
Association between alcohol use and femicide in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间南非饮酒与女性杀人案之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jul;13(7):e1291-e1300. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00115-9.
7
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
8
Service Interruption in HIV Care Amid COVID-19 Pandemic in Myanmar: Results From Analysis of Routine Program Data 2018-2022.缅甸新冠疫情期间艾滋病护理服务中断情况:2018 - 2022年常规项目数据分析结果
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:23259582241299466. doi: 10.1177/23259582241299466.
9
Increase in intimate partner violence during the COVID19 lockdown in uganda: a household survey.乌干达新冠疫情封锁期间亲密伴侣暴力行为增加:一项家庭调查
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):2708. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24023-1.
10
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.