University of Washington, Seattle.
Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jul;76(7):936-942. doi: 10.1002/acr.25317. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of a Multidisciplinary Care Assessment (MCA) billing code on health system costs and access to care in British Columbia (BC).
Data on all people treated by rheumatologists in BC were obtained from five linked health administrative databases held by Population Data BC from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2020. Rheumatologists were allocated to either the intervention (ever-billers) or control groups (never-billers). For the intervention group, the index date was the month of the first MCA code billing. For the control group the index dates were imputed from intervention index dates. Our analysis focused on a 48-month period (24 months before and after the index date). We evaluated the impact on two cost (costs related to rheumatoid arthritis [RA]; total health care costs) and access outcomes (rheumatology-related visits per rheumatologist; days between rheumatology visits for patients with RA) using an interrupted time series analysis.
A total of 46 rheumatologists (31 intervention and 15 control) met our inclusion criteria. Introduction of the MCA was associated with a small but significant increase in RA-related costs that, at 2 years, translates to a net absolute change of $9.66 per patient per month, but no statistically significant changes in total health care costs. There was no statistically significant change in the number of rheumatology-related visits, but at 2 years there was a net absolute reduction in the median days between rheumatologist visits for patients with RA (6.3 days).
The introduction of the MCA code was associated with a negligible increase in the RA-related costs and an improvement in access to ongoing care for patients.
本研究旨在评估多学科护理评估(MCA)计费代码对不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)卫生系统成本和护理可及性的影响。
从 2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日,从人口数据 BC 的五个链接健康管理数据库中获取了所有在 BC 接受风湿病医生治疗的人的数据。风湿病医生被分配到干预组(始终计费)或对照组(从不计费)。对于干预组,索引日期为第一个 MCA 代码计费的月份。对于对照组,索引日期是从干预索引日期推断出来的。我们的分析重点是 48 个月的时间段(索引日期前 24 个月和后 24 个月)。我们使用中断时间序列分析评估了对两个成本(与类风湿关节炎相关的成本;总医疗保健成本)和两个访问结果(每位风湿病医生的风湿病相关就诊次数;类风湿关节炎患者的风湿病就诊之间的天数)的影响。
共有 46 名风湿病医生(31 名干预组和 15 名对照组)符合我们的纳入标准。MCA 的引入与与 RA 相关的成本的小但显著增加相关,在 2 年内,这意味着每个患者每月的净绝对变化为 9.66 加元,但总医疗保健成本没有统计学上的显著变化。风湿病相关就诊次数没有统计学上的显著变化,但在 2 年内,RA 患者的风湿病医生就诊之间的中位数天数有净绝对减少(6.3 天)。
MCA 代码的引入与 RA 相关成本的微不足道增加以及患者获得持续护理的机会的改善有关。