Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, El Gomhouria St, Mansoura, 35511, Egypt.
Medical Research Group of Egypt, Negida Academy LLC, Arlington, MA, 02474, USA.
Neurol Sci. 2024 Aug;45(8):3989-4001. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07412-z. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
The rare nature of dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonia has limited the available evidence on the efficacy of mexiletine as a potential treatment. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine for both dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonic patients.
The search was conducted on various electronic databases up to March 2023, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mexiletine versus placebo in myotonic patients. A risk of bias assessment was carried out, and relevant data was extracted manually into an online sheet. RevMan software (version 5.4) was employed for analysis.
A total of five studies, comprising 186 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that mexiletine was significantly more effective than placebo in improving stiffness score (SMD = - 1.19, 95% CI [- 1.53, - 0.85]), as well as in reducing hand grip myotonia (MD = - 1.36 s, 95% CI [- 1.83, - 0.89]). Mexiletine also significantly improved SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Score in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia only. Regarding safety, mexiletine did not significantly alter ECG parameters but was associated with greater gastrointestinal symptoms (GIT) compared to placebo (RR 3.7, 95% CI [1.79, 7.64]). Other adverse events showed no significant differences.
The results support that mexiletine is effective and safe in myotonic patients; however, it is associated with a higher risk of GIT symptoms. Due to the scarcity of published RCTs and the prevalence of GIT symptoms, we recommend further well-designed RCTs testing various drug combinations to reduce GIT symptoms.
由于营养不良性和非营养不良性肌强直的罕见性,限制了米噻林作为潜在治疗药物疗效的可用证据。为了弥补这一空白,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估米噻林对营养不良性和非营养不良性肌强直患者的有效性和安全性。
我们在各种电子数据库中进行了检索,检索截至 2023 年 3 月,比较了米噻林与安慰剂治疗肌强直患者的随机临床试验(RCT)。我们进行了风险偏倚评估,并手动将相关数据提取到在线表格中。我们使用 RevMan 软件(版本 5.4)进行分析。
共有五项研究,包括 186 名患者,被纳入荟萃分析。我们的研究结果表明,米噻林在改善僵硬评分(SMD=-1.19,95%CI[-1.53,-0.85])和减轻手部握力肌强直(MD=-1.36 s,95%CI[-1.83,-0.89])方面,明显优于安慰剂。米噻林还显著改善了非营养不良性肌强直患者的 SF-36 身体和精神成分评分。关于安全性,米噻林并未显著改变心电图参数,但与安慰剂相比,胃肠道症状(GIT)发生率更高(RR 3.7,95%CI[1.79,7.64])。其他不良反应无显著差异。
研究结果支持米噻林在肌强直患者中有效且安全,但与更高的胃肠道症状风险相关。由于发表的 RCT 数量稀少且胃肠道症状的普遍存在,我们建议进一步开展设计良好的 RCT,以测试各种药物组合来减少胃肠道症状。