Donnelly Maeve G, Karsten Amanda M
Western New England University, Springfield, MA USA.
Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Dec 26;17(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00891-0. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Behavior-analytic toilet training (BATT) methods to support urine continence have been reviewed and replicated in numerous studies. Despite empirical validations of BATT, children with disabilities may not experience successful toilet training nor access the associated health and social benefits of urinary continence. It is possible these outcomes are partially due to practical barriers that arise throughout urine training. In practice, barriers may interfere with toilet training to the extent that training is postponed or discontinued, resulting in long-term incontinence and other related problems. Examples of barriers include problem behavior, excessive urine retention, recurrent accidents, and excessive or insufficient independent self-initiations to toilet. Researchers have sometimes described strategies to address these types of barriers. However, practitioners may not be aware of these strategies because they are secondary to the purpose of an investigation and may only apply to a subset of participants. The purpose of this review article is to synthesize the collection of barrier solutions described in published research on urine training for children with developmental disabilities. Results may assist practitioners in modifying BATT according to an evidence-based practice framework until their clients overcome barriers to achieve urine continence.
支持尿失禁管理的行为分析如厕训练(BATT)方法已在众多研究中得到综述和重复验证。尽管BATT已得到实证验证,但残疾儿童可能无法成功完成如厕训练,也无法获得尿失禁带来的相关健康和社会效益。这些结果可能部分归因于整个排尿训练过程中出现的实际障碍。在实践中,这些障碍可能会干扰如厕训练,以至于训练被推迟或中断,导致长期尿失禁和其他相关问题。障碍的例子包括问题行为、尿液过度潴留、反复尿床以及自主去厕所的次数过多或过少。研究人员有时会描述应对这些类型障碍的策略。然而,从业者可能并不知晓这些策略,因为它们对于调查目的而言是次要的,并且可能仅适用于一部分参与者。这篇综述文章的目的是综合已发表的关于发育障碍儿童排尿训练研究中所描述的一系列障碍解决方案。研究结果可能有助于从业者根据循证实践框架调整BATT,直到他们的客户克服障碍实现尿失禁管理。