Zhang Size, Nie Xuexuan, Bi Yuhua, Yan Jie, Liu Shaohua, Peng Yiyuan
Yunnan Key Laboratory of Internal Combustion Engine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China.
Kunming Yunnei Power Co., Ltd., Kunming 650500, China.
ACS Omega. 2024 Feb 8;9(7):8308-8319. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09052. eCollection 2024 Feb 20.
Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) are crucial technologies for mitigating nitrogen oxide (NO) emissions in diesel engines. Although EGR reduces engine outlet NO emissions, it simultaneously increases diesel consumption, leading to a poor economic performance. SCR requires AdBlue consumption; thus, striking the right balance for overall engine economy is of utmost importance. This study aims to evaluate NO emission control and fluid cost in diesel engines. The total fluid cost of the diesel engine includes diesel and AdBlue. The engine is equipped with an aftertreatment system comprising a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), diesel particulate filter (DPF), selective catalytic reduction (SCR), and ammonia slip catalyst (ASC). The study was carried out at 1600 and 2100 rpm (25, 50, 75, and 100% load). The results show that with the increase of EGR valve opening, the exhaust temperature increased, the brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) increased, and the NO emission decreased. With the increased AdBlue dosage, the NO conversion efficiency gradually improved, ultimately approaching near-zero NO emissions. However, as NO emissions decreased, the equivalent diesel fluid cost rose. At 1600 r/min (100% load), when the NO emissions were reduced by zero, the maximum fluid costs were 235, 223, and 218g/(kW·h) under the AdBlue/diesel price ratios of 1/1, 1/2, and 1/3, respectively. As the AdBlue/diesel price ratio decreases, the influence of EGR on the fluid cost diminishes. Coordinated control of EGR and AdBlue allows for reduced NO emissions while mitigating the overall cost of diesel engines and aftertreatment systems. This research provides valuable guidance for EGR and urea control in diesel engines and contributes to the field of diesel engine emission control.
废气再循环(EGR)和选择性催化还原(SCR)是减轻柴油发动机氮氧化物(NO)排放的关键技术。尽管废气再循环可降低发动机出口处的NO排放,但同时会增加柴油消耗,导致经济性能不佳。选择性催化还原需要消耗车用尿素水溶液(AdBlue);因此,在发动机整体经济性方面找到恰当的平衡至关重要。本研究旨在评估柴油发动机中的NO排放控制和流体成本。柴油发动机的总流体成本包括柴油和AdBlue。该发动机配备了一个后处理系统,该系统由柴油氧化催化剂(DOC)、柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF)、选择性催化还原(SCR)和氨逃逸催化剂(ASC)组成。该研究在1600和2100转/分钟(25%、50%、75%和100%负荷)下进行。结果表明,随着废气再循环阀开度的增加,排气温度升高,制动比油耗(BSFC)增加,NO排放降低。随着AdBlue用量的增加,NO转化效率逐渐提高,最终接近零NO排放。然而,随着NO排放的降低,等效柴油流体成本上升。在1600转/分钟(100%负荷)下,当NO排放降至零时,在AdBlue/柴油价格比为1/1、1/2和1/3的情况下,最大流体成本分别为235、223和218克/(千瓦·时)。随着AdBlue/柴油价格比的降低,废气再循环对流体成本的影响减小。废气再循环和AdBlue的协同控制可在减少NO排放的同时,降低柴油发动机和后处理系统的总体成本。本研究为柴油发动机的废气再循环和尿素控制提供了有价值的指导,并为柴油发动机排放控制领域做出了贡献。