Scheibe Sandy, Timpel Patrick, Mäder Melanie, Heinrich Ria, Kugler Joachim, Schönfelder Tonio
WIG2 GmbH, Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Lehrstuhl Gesundheitswissenschaften/Public Health, Technische Universität Dresden, Deutschland.
Pflege. 2025 Feb;38(1):11-21. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000983. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
The effectiveness of digital care applications in people with need of home care: A systematic review The growing need for long-term care poses challenges for healthcare systems. In June 2021, digital care applications (DiPA) were introduced as a new service in the statutory long-term care insurance in Germany. Their aim is to counteract the increased care need and/or support independence in the home. This project systematically identified and reported on national and international evidence on DiPA effectiveness, as described by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement by means of systematic searches in the databases Medline and Cinahl, and supplemented by an extensive manual search (08/2022). Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). The results were synthesized narratively. Eight randomized controlled studies were included; improvements in cognition, activities of daily living, and mobility in home care patients, were reported. Study quality was low to moderate, due to mostly unblinded study designs and low case numbers. The currently available evidence fails to provide a reliable basis for assessing the benefits of DiPA, to neither DiPA manufacturers, nor to responsible parties in the healthcare system. Further research on DiPA effectiveness, particularly with high-quality studies, are necessary to assess its potential in the German care sector.
一项系统评价 长期护理需求的不断增长给医疗保健系统带来了挑战。2021年6月,数字护理应用程序(DiPA)作为一项新服务被引入德国法定长期护理保险。其目的是应对日益增长的护理需求和/或支持居家独立生活。 正如联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)所描述的,该项目系统地识别并报告了关于DiPA有效性的国内和国际证据。 该系统评价按照PRISMA声明,通过在Medline和Cinahl数据库中进行系统检索,并辅以广泛的手工检索(2022年8月)。使用偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估研究质量。结果采用叙述性综合分析。 纳入了八项随机对照研究;报告显示居家护理患者的认知、日常生活活动和行动能力有所改善。由于大多数研究设计未设盲且病例数较少,研究质量为低到中等。 目前可得的证据未能为评估DiPA的益处提供可靠依据,无论是对DiPA制造商还是医疗保健系统中的责任方而言。有必要对DiPA的有效性进行进一步研究,尤其是高质量的研究,以评估其在德国护理领域的潜力。