• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在小型真实社交网络中创建朋友和敌人群体的建模。

Modelling the creation of friends and foes groups in small real social networks.

机构信息

Departamento de Sistemas Complejos, Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Coyoacán, CDMX, México.

Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Coyoacán, CDMX, México.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0298791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298791. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0298791
PMID:38412166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898769/
Abstract

Although friendship networks have been extensively studied, few models and studies are available to understand the reciprocity of friendship and foes. Here a model is presented to explain the directed friendship and foes network formation observed in experiments of Mexican and Hungarian schools. Within the presented model, each agent has a private opinion and a public one that shares to the group. There are two kinds of interactions between agents. The first kind represent interactions with the neighbors while the other represents the attitude of an agent to the overall public available information. Links between agents evolve as a combination of the public and private information available. Friendship is defined using a fitness function according to the strength of the agent's bonds, clustering coefficient, betweenness centrality and degree. Enmity is defined as very negative links. The model allows us to reproduce the distribution of mentions for friends and foes observed in the experiments, as well as the topology of the directed networks.

摘要

尽管友谊网络已经得到了广泛的研究,但很少有模型和研究可以用来理解友谊和敌人的互惠关系。在这里,提出了一个模型来解释在墨西哥和匈牙利学校的实验中观察到的有向友谊和敌人网络的形成。在所提出的模型中,每个代理都有一个私人意见和一个公开意见,公开意见与群体共享。代理之间存在两种类型的交互。第一种代表与邻居的交互,而另一种代表代理对整体公共可用信息的态度。代理之间的链接作为可用公共和私人信息的组合进行演变。友谊是根据代理的联系强度、聚类系数、介数中心度和度使用适合度函数定义的。敌意被定义为非常负面的联系。该模型允许我们再现实验中观察到的朋友和敌人提及的分布,以及有向网络的拓扑结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/b32d8353fc8c/pone.0298791.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/52b8a07ba401/pone.0298791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/346f9bac0051/pone.0298791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/ed35c440538a/pone.0298791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/c870b6d58bdf/pone.0298791.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/3c37c9371688/pone.0298791.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/b32d8353fc8c/pone.0298791.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/52b8a07ba401/pone.0298791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/346f9bac0051/pone.0298791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/ed35c440538a/pone.0298791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/c870b6d58bdf/pone.0298791.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/3c37c9371688/pone.0298791.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5d/10898769/b32d8353fc8c/pone.0298791.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling the creation of friends and foes groups in small real social networks.在小型真实社交网络中创建朋友和敌人群体的建模。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0298791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298791. eCollection 2024.
2
Popularity and Entropy in Friendship and Enmity Networks in Classrooms.课堂中友谊与敌意网络中的受欢迎程度和熵
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;25(7):971. doi: 10.3390/e25070971.
3
Asocial balance-how your friends determine your enemies: understanding the co-evolution of friendship and enmity interactions in a virtual world.一种社会平衡——你的朋友如何决定你的敌人:理解虚拟世界中友谊与敌意互动的共同进化。
J Comput Soc Sci. 2018;1(1):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s42001-017-0010-9. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
4
Modeling social network topologies in elementary schools.建模小学中的社交网络拓扑结构。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055371. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Composition and structure of a large online social network in The Netherlands.荷兰大型在线社交网络的组成与结构。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034760. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
6
The enmity paradox.敌友悖论。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):20040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47167-9.
7
Friendship Concept and Community Network Structure among Elementary School and University Students.小学生和大学生的友谊观念与社区网络结构
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164886. eCollection 2016.
8
Copula-based analysis of the generalized friendship paradox in clustered networks.基于连接函数的聚类网络中广义友谊悖论分析
Chaos. 2022 Dec;32(12):123139. doi: 10.1063/5.0122351.
9
Game-theoretical approach for opinion dynamics on social networks.基于博弈论的社交网络舆论动态研究
Chaos. 2022 Jul;32(7):073117. doi: 10.1063/5.0084178.
10
One tie to capture advice and friendship: Leader multiplex centrality effects on team performance change.一条纽带:领导者多重中心度对团队绩效的影响变化。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jun;107(6):968-986. doi: 10.1037/apl0000979. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Popularity and Entropy in Friendship and Enmity Networks in Classrooms.课堂中友谊与敌意网络中的受欢迎程度和熵
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;25(7):971. doi: 10.3390/e25070971.
2
Turnover in close friendships.亲密友谊的变化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15070-4.
3
Asocial balance-how your friends determine your enemies: understanding the co-evolution of friendship and enmity interactions in a virtual world.一种社会平衡——你的朋友如何决定你的敌人:理解虚拟世界中友谊与敌意互动的共同进化。
J Comput Soc Sci. 2018;1(1):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s42001-017-0010-9. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
4
Defending one's friends, not one's enemies: A social network analysis of children's defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet.捍卫朋友,而非敌人:使用 XPNet 对儿童的捍卫、友谊和不喜欢关系进行社会网络分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 18;13(5):e0194323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194323. eCollection 2018.
5
Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools.冲突气候的转变:一项针对56所学校的社交网络实验
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):566-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514483113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Dynamics of deceptive interactions in social networks.社交网络中欺骗性互动的动态变化
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Nov 6;12(112). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0798.
7
Social network size in humans.人类的社交网络规模。
Hum Nat. 2003 Mar;14(1):53-72. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y.
8
Effects of deception in social networks.社交网络中欺骗行为的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 7;281(1790). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1195.
9
Limited communication capacity unveils strategies for human interaction.有限的沟通能力揭示了人类互动的策略。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1950. doi: 10.1038/srep01950.
10
In battle. Tweeting the London riots.在战斗中。报道伦敦骚乱并发布推文。 (原英文表述不太符合正常逻辑,此译文是尽量根据字面意思翻译,使其在中文语境下稍通顺些)
Science. 2012 May 18;336(6083):831. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6083.831.