Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Feb 26;13(1):e002634. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002634.
Standards to define and measure quality in healthcare for cardiovascular disease risk reduction and secondary prevention are available, but there is a paucity of indicators that could serve as facilitators of structural change at a system level. This research study aimed to develop a range of delivery indicators to help cardiac clinical networks assess delivery of and progress towards cardiovascular disease objectives.
This study used an adapted version of the European Society of Cardiology's four-step process for the development of quality indicators. The four steps in this study were as follows: identify critical factors of enablement, construct a list of candidate indicators, select a final set of indicators and assess availability of national data for each indicator. In this iterative process, a core project group of six members was supported by a wider review group of 21 people from the National Health Service (NHS) clinical and management personnel database.
The core project group identified six relevant cardiovascular disease priorities in the NHS Long Term Plan and used an iterative process to identify 21 critical factors that impact on their implementation. A total of 57 potential indicators that could be measures of implementation were developed. The core project group agreed on a set of 38 candidate indicators that were circulated to the review group for rating. Based on these scores, the core project group excluded 5 indicators to arrive at a final set of 33 delivery indicators. National datasets were available for 22 of the final indicators, which were designated as delivery indicators. The remaining 11, for which national datasets were not available but locally available datasets could be used, were designated as delivery enablers.
The suite of delivery indicators and delivery enablers for cardiovascular disease could allow a more focused evaluation of factors that impact on delivery of healthcare for cardiovascular disease.
心血管疾病风险降低和二级预防的医疗保健质量定义和衡量标准已经存在,但缺乏可以作为系统层面结构变革促进因素的指标。本研究旨在开发一系列交付指标,以帮助心脏临床网络评估心血管疾病目标的交付和进展情况。
本研究使用了欧洲心脏病学会的质量指标制定的四步过程的改编版本。本研究中的四个步骤如下:确定实现的关键因素,构建候选指标列表,选择最终的指标集,并评估每个指标的国家数据可用性。在这个迭代过程中,一个由六名成员组成的核心项目组得到了来自国家卫生服务(NHS)临床和管理人员数据库的 21 名更广泛的审查组成员的支持。
核心项目组在 NHS 长期计划中确定了六个相关的心血管疾病优先事项,并使用迭代过程确定了 21 个影响其实施的关键因素。共开发了 57 个可能衡量实施情况的潜在指标。核心项目组同意将 38 个候选指标作为一组进行评估,并将其分发给审查组进行评分。根据这些分数,核心项目组排除了 5 个指标,最终确定了 33 个交付指标。最终指标中的 22 个指标有国家数据集,被指定为交付指标。其余 11 个指标没有国家数据集,但可以使用本地可用的数据集,被指定为交付推动者。
心血管疾病的交付指标和交付推动者套件可以更集中地评估影响心血管疾病医疗保健交付的因素。