Suppr超能文献

开发一套质量指标集,以衡量和改善创伤性脑损伤患者 ICU 护理质量。

Development of a quality indicator set to measure and improve quality of ICU care for patients with traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Mar 22;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2377-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop a set of quality indicators for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in intensive care units (ICUs) across Europe and to explore barriers and facilitators for implementation of these quality indicators.

METHODS

A preliminary list of 66 quality indicators was developed, based on current guidelines, existing practice variation, and clinical expertise in TBI management at the ICU. Eight TBI experts of the Advisory Committee preselected the quality indicators during a first Delphi round. A larger Europe-wide expert panel was recruited for the next two Delphi rounds. Quality indicator definitions were evaluated on four criteria: validity (better performance on the indicator reflects better processes of care and leads to better patient outcome), feasibility (data are available or easy to obtain), discriminability (variability in clinical practice), and actionability (professionals can act based on the indicator). Experts scored indicators on a 5-point Likert scale delivered by an electronic survey tool.

RESULTS

The expert panel consisted of 50 experts from 18 countries across Europe, mostly intensivists (N = 24, 48%) and neurosurgeons (N = 7, 14%). Experts agreed on a final set of 42 indicators to assess quality of ICU care: 17 structure indicators, 16 process indicators, and 9 outcome indicators. Experts are motivated to implement this finally proposed set (N = 49, 98%) and indicated routine measurement in registries (N = 41, 82%), benchmarking (N = 42, 84%), and quality improvement programs (N = 41, 82%) as future steps. Administrative burden was indicated as the most important barrier for implementation of the indicator set (N = 48, 98%).

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi consensus study gives insight in which quality indicators have the potential to improve quality of TBI care at European ICUs. The proposed quality indicator set is recommended to be used across Europe for registry purposes to gain insight in current ICU practices and outcomes of patients with TBI. This indicator set may become an important tool to support benchmarking and quality improvement programs for patients with TBI in the future.

摘要

背景

我们旨在为欧洲重症监护病房(ICU)的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者制定一套质量指标,并探讨实施这些质量指标的障碍和促进因素。

方法

根据当前指南、现有的实践差异以及 ICU 中 TBI 管理的临床专业知识,初步制定了 66 项质量指标清单。在第一轮 Delphi 中,8 名 TBI 专家咨询委员会成员预先选择了质量指标。随后两轮 Delphi 招募了更多的欧洲专家。质量指标的定义根据以下四个标准进行评估:有效性(更好的指标表现反映出更好的护理过程,从而带来更好的患者结果)、可行性(数据可用或易于获取)、可区分性(临床实践中的差异)和可操作性(专业人员可以根据指标采取行动)。专家通过电子调查工具以 5 分制对指标进行评分。

结果

专家小组由来自欧洲 18 个国家的 50 名专家组成,主要是重症监护医生(N=24,48%)和神经外科医生(N=7,14%)。专家们就评估 ICU 护理质量的最终 42 项指标达成一致:17 项结构指标、16 项过程指标和 9 项结果指标。专家们有动力实施这一最终提出的指标集(N=49,98%),并表示将在登记处进行常规测量(N=41,82%)、基准测试(N=42,84%)和质量改进计划(N=41,82%)作为未来的步骤。行政负担被认为是实施指标集的最重要障碍(N=48,98%)。

结论

这项 Delphi 共识研究深入了解了哪些质量指标有可能提高欧洲 ICU 中 TBI 护理的质量。建议在整个欧洲使用该质量指标集进行登记,以了解当前 TBI 患者的 ICU 实践和结果。该指标集有望成为未来支持 TBI 患者基准测试和质量改进计划的重要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a33d/6431034/4e135cc46216/13054_2019_2377_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验