Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 27;9(2):e013855. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013855.
Unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) contributes to a high burden of disease and exacerbates factors that promote the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Enforceable policies are foundational to curbing inappropriate use of antimicrobials and providing safe WASH. While many countries have established National Action Plans for AMR that include provisions for WASH, few have codified these plans into legally enforceable policy. Here, we provide a comprehensive map and describe the current regulatory environment for WASH.
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the WASH-related policies in 193 countries. Policies were identified, collated, and categorised into a publicly available repository.
A total of 672 policies met the criteria for inclusion in the dataset. No category of WASH-related policies had been adopted by all countries included in the study. Policy categories that were potentially more difficult to enforce in light of economic and governance limitations tended to be more prevalent and diverse, whereas policies in categories that were highly resource intensive and specific were less universal. Countries with gaps in policy categories also tended to be regionally clustered. While countries in the South Asian and European WHO regions had nearly universal policy coverage across all countries, the presence of policies was inconsistent across countries in the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions.
While decision-makers should rely on knowing which policies work best to mitigate the burden of WASH-related disease and AMR development, they must first have a comprehensive understanding of the current regulatory environment. Researchers and decision-makers need to know which policies work best and under what circumstances. The global mapping of WASH policies, which may have implications for AMR development, serves as a foundation for future policy analysis for AMR.
不安全的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)导致了大量疾病,加剧了促进抗生素耐药性(AMR)发展的因素。可执行的政策是遏制抗生素不当使用和提供安全的 WASH 的基础。虽然许多国家已经制定了包含 WASH 条款的国家抗生素耐药性行动计划,但很少将这些计划纳入具有法律约束力的政策。在这里,我们提供了一个全面的地图,并描述了 WASH 的当前监管环境。
我们对 193 个国家的 WASH 相关政策进行了全面分析。政策被识别、整理并分类到一个公共可用的存储库中。
共有 672 项政策符合纳入数据集的标准。没有一个 WASH 相关政策类别被纳入研究的所有国家所采用。鉴于经济和治理方面的限制,具有潜在更难执行的政策类别往往更为普遍和多样化,而那些资源密集度高和特定的政策类别则不太普遍。政策类别存在差距的国家也往往在区域上集中。虽然世卫组织南亚和欧洲区域的国家在所有国家中几乎普遍涵盖了所有政策类别,但在非洲和东地中海区域的国家中,政策的存在并不一致。
虽然决策者应该依靠了解哪些政策最能减轻与 WASH 相关的疾病和 AMR 发展的负担,但他们首先必须全面了解当前的监管环境。研究人员和决策者需要了解哪些政策最有效,以及在什么情况下最有效。WASH 政策的全球映射可能对 AMR 发展产生影响,为 AMR 的未来政策分析奠定了基础。