Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 May;38(5):1135-1143. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
To demonstrate the value of a viscoelastic-based intraoperative transfusion algorithm to reduce non-RBC product administration in adult cardiac surgical patients.
A prospective observational study.
At a quaternary academic teaching hospital.
Cardiac surgical patients.
Viscoelastic-based intraoperative transfusion algorithm.
The study authors compared intraoperative blood product transfusion rates in 184 cardiac surgical patients to 236 historic controls after implementing a viscoelastic-based algorithm. The authors found a non-significant reduction in transfusion of 23.8% for fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units (0.84 ± 1.4 v 0.64 ± 1.38; p = ns), 33.4% for platelet units (0.90 ± 1.39 v 0.60 ± 131; p = ns), and 15.8% for cryoprecipitate units (0.19 ± 0.54 v 0.16 ± 0.50; p = ns). They found a 43.9% reduction in red blood cell (RBC) units transfused (1.98 ± 2.24 v 0.55 ± 1.36; p = 0.008). There were no statistically significant differences in time to extubation (8.0 hours (4.0-21.0) v 8.0 (4.0-22.3), reoperation for bleeding (15 [12.3%] v 10 [10.6%]), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) (51.0 hours [28.0-100.5] v 53.5 [33.3-99.0]) or hospital LOS (9.0 days [6.0-15.0] v 10.0 [7.0-17.0]). Deviation from algorithm adherence was 32.7% (48/147). Packed RBC, FFP, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and cell saver were significantly reduced in the Algorithm Compliant Cohort compared with historic controls, whereas times to extubation, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS did not reach significance.
After the implementation of a viscoelastic-based algorithm, patients received fewer packed RBC, FFP, platelets, cryoprecipitate, and cell saver. Algorithm-compliant patients received fewer transfusions; however, reductions in times to extubation, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were not statistically significant compared with historic controls.
展示基于黏弹性的术中输血算法在减少成人心脏手术患者非红细胞制品输注方面的价值。
前瞻性观察性研究。
在一所四级学术教学医院。
心脏手术患者。
基于黏弹性的术中输血算法。
研究作者比较了 184 例心脏手术患者与实施黏弹性算法后的 236 例历史对照患者的术中血液制品输注率。作者发现,新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)单位的输注量非显著减少 23.8%(0.84 ± 1.4 比 0.64 ± 1.38;p = ns),血小板单位减少 33.4%(0.90 ± 1.39 比 0.60 ± 131;p = ns),冷沉淀单位减少 15.8%(0.19 ± 0.54 比 0.16 ± 0.50;p = ns)。他们发现红细胞(RBC)单位的输注量减少了 43.9%(1.98 ± 2.24 比 0.55 ± 1.36;p = 0.008)。气管拔管时间(8.0 小时(4.0-21.0)比 8.0 小时(4.0-22.3)、再次出血手术(15 [12.3%] 比 10 [10.6%])、重症监护病房住院时间(ICU LOS)(51.0 小时(28.0-100.5)比 53.5 小时(33.3-99.0))或住院 LOS(9.0 天(6.0-15.0)比 10.0 天(7.0-17.0))无统计学显著差异。对算法依从性的偏离率为 32.7%(48/147)。与历史对照相比,在符合算法的患者中,浓缩红细胞、FFP、血小板、冷沉淀和细胞保存液的用量显著减少,而气管拔管时间、ICU LOS 和住院 LOS 没有达到统计学意义。
在实施基于黏弹性的算法后,患者接受的浓缩红细胞、FFP、血小板、冷沉淀和细胞保存液输注量减少。符合算法的患者接受的输血减少;然而,与历史对照相比,气管拔管时间、ICU LOS 和住院 LOS 的减少没有统计学意义。