Department of Radiology, North Zealand Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2010-2018. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10709-x. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
To investigate factors associated with risk for rebleeding and 30-day mortality following prophylactic transarterial embolization in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records and included all patients who had undergone prophylactic embolization of the gastroduodenal artery at Rigshospitalet, Denmark, following an endoscopy-verified and treated peptic Sulcer bleeding, from 2016 to 2021. Data were collected from electronic health records and imaging from the embolization procedures. Primary outcomes were rebleeding and 30-day mortality. We performed logistical regression analyses for both outcomes with possible risk factors. Risk factors included: active bleeding; visible hemoclips; Rockall-score; anatomical variants; standardized embolization procedure; and number of endoscopies prior to embolization.
We included 176 patients. Rebleeding occurred in 25% following embolization and 30-day mortality was 15%. Not undergoing a standardized embolization procedure increased the odds of both rebleeding (odds ratio 3.029, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.395-6.579) and 30-day overall mortality by 3.262 (1.252-8.497). More than one endoscopy was associated with increased odds of rebleeding (odds ratio 2.369, 95% CI 1.088-5.158). High Rockall-score increased the odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 2.587, 95% CI 1.243-5.386). Active bleeding, visible hemoclips, and anatomical variants did not affect risk of rebleeding or 30-day mortality. Reasons for deviation from standard embolization procedure were anatomical variations, targeted treatment without embolizing the gastroduodenal artery, and technical failure.
Deviation from the standard embolization procedure increased the risk of rebleeding and 30-day mortality, more than one endoscopy prior to embolization was associated with higher odds of rebleeding, and a high Rockall-score increased the risk of 30-day mortality. We suggest that patients with these risk factors are monitored closely following embolization. Early detection of rebleeding may allow for proper and early re-intervention.
为了研究在高危消化性溃疡出血患者中预防性经动脉栓塞治疗后再出血和 30 天死亡率的相关因素。
我们回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2021 年在丹麦 Rigshospitalet 接受内镜证实和治疗的消化性溃疡出血后行胃十二指肠动脉预防性栓塞治疗的所有患者的病历资料。数据来自电子健康记录和栓塞治疗的影像学资料。主要结局为再出血和 30 天死亡率。我们对两种结局进行了逻辑回归分析,并考虑了可能的风险因素。风险因素包括:活动性出血;可见的止血夹;Rockall 评分;解剖变异;标准化栓塞程序;以及栓塞前内镜检查的次数。
我们纳入了 176 名患者。栓塞后再出血发生率为 25%,30 天死亡率为 15%。未行标准化栓塞程序会增加再出血(比值比 3.029,95%置信区间 1.395-6.579)和 30 天总死亡率(比值比 3.262,95%置信区间 1.252-8.497)的风险。多次内镜检查与再出血风险增加相关(比值比 2.369,95%置信区间 1.088-5.158)。高 Rockall 评分增加 30 天死亡率的风险(比值比 2.587,95%置信区间 1.243-5.386)。活动性出血、可见的止血夹和解剖变异并不影响再出血或 30 天死亡率的风险。偏离标准栓塞程序的原因包括解剖变异、有针对性的治疗而不栓塞胃十二指肠动脉,以及技术失败。
偏离标准栓塞程序会增加再出血和 30 天死亡率的风险,栓塞前多次内镜检查与再出血风险增加相关,高 Rockall 评分增加 30 天死亡率的风险。我们建议这些风险因素的患者在栓塞后密切监测。早期发现再出血可能允许进行适当和早期的再次干预。