Suppr超能文献

栓塞术治疗上、下消化道急性非静脉曲张性出血:一项系统评价

Embolization for acute nonvariceal bleeding of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review.

作者信息

Ini' Corrado, Distefano Giulio, Sanfilippo Filippo, Castiglione Davide Giuseppe, Falsaperla Daniele, Giurazza Francesco, Mosconi Cristina, Tiralongo Francesco, Foti Pietro Valerio, Palmucci Stefano, Venturini Massimo, Basile Antonio

机构信息

Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania -Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, A.O.U. 'Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele', Catania, Italy.

出版信息

CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Mar 29;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00360-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleedings (GIBs) are pathological conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Embolization without angiographic evidence of contrast media extravasation is proposed as an effective procedure in patients with clinical and/or laboratory signs of bleeding. The purpose of this systematic review is to define common clinical practice and clinical and technical outcomes of blind and preventive embolization for upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

MAIN BODY

Through the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar database, an extensive search was performed in the fields of empiric and preventive embolization for the treatment of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleedings (UGIB and LGIB). Inclusion criteria were: articles in English for which it has been possible to access the entire content; adults patients treated with empiric or blind transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for UGIB and/or LGIB. Only studies that analysed clinical and technical success rate of blind and empiric TAE for UGIB and/or LGIB were considered for our research. Exclusion criteria were: recurrent articles from the same authors, articles written in other languages, those in which the entire content could not be accessed and that articles were not consistent to the purposes of our research. We collected pooled data on 1019 patients from 32 separate articles selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 22 studies focused on UGIB (total 773 patients), one articles focused on LGIB (total 6 patients) and 9 studies enrolled patients with both UGIB and LGIB (total 240 patients). Technical success rate varied from 62% to 100%, with a mean value of 97.7%; clinical success rate varied from 51% to 100% with a mean value of 80%. The total number of complications was 57 events out of 1019 procedures analysed.

CONCLUSION

TAE is an effective procedure in the treatment of UGIB patients in which angiography does not demonstrate direct sign of ongoing bleeding. The attitude in the treatment of LGIBs must be more prudent in relation to poor vascular anastomoses and the high risk of intestinal ischemia. Blind and preventive procedures cumulatively present a relatively low risk of complications, compared to a relatively high technical and clinical success.

摘要

背景

急性非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血(GIBs)是具有显著发病率和死亡率的病理状况。对于有临床和/或实验室出血迹象的患者,在无造影剂外渗血管造影证据的情况下进行栓塞术被认为是一种有效的治疗方法。本系统评价的目的是确定上、下消化道出血的盲目性和预防性栓塞术的常见临床实践以及临床和技术结果。

正文

通过PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术数据库,在经验性和预防性栓塞治疗上、下消化道出血(UGIB和LGIB)领域进行了广泛检索。纳入标准为:可获取全文的英文文章;接受经验性或盲目性经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)治疗UGIB和/或LGIB的成年患者。我们的研究仅考虑分析UGIB和/或LGIB的盲目性和经验性TAE临床及技术成功率的研究。排除标准为:同一作者的重复文章、其他语言撰写的文章、无法获取全文的文章以及与我们研究目的不符的文章。我们从根据纳入和排除标准选择的32篇独立文章中收集了1019例患者的汇总数据。22项研究聚焦于UGIB(共773例患者),1篇文章聚焦于LGIB(共6例患者),9项研究纳入了UGIB和LGIB患者(共240例患者)。技术成功率从62%至100%不等,平均值为97.7%;临床成功率从51%至100%不等,平均值为80%。在分析的1019例手术中,并发症总数为57例。

结论

TAE是治疗UGIB患者的有效方法,这些患者血管造影未显示持续出血的直接征象。鉴于血管吻合不佳和肠道缺血风险高,在治疗LGIB时态度必须更加谨慎。与相对较高的技术和临床成功率相比,盲目性和预防性手术累积出现并发症的风险相对较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26f/10060444/ff633ed6c420/42155_2023_360_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验