First report of barley yellow dwarf virus PAS () in oat in Australia.

Luteoviruses (family ) and poleroviruses (family ) are economically important pathogens of cereals such as wheat (), barley () and oat (). In Australia, the luteoviruses barley yellow dwarf virus PAV (BYDV PAV) and barley yellow dwarf virus MAV (BYDV MAV), along with the poleroviruses cereal yellow dwarf virus RPV (CYDV RPV) and maize yellow dwarf virus RMV (MYDV RMV), were distinguished from each other and reported in the 1980s (Sward and Lister 1988; Waterhouse and Helms 1985). The poleroviruses barley virus G (BVG) and cereal yellow dwarf virus RPS (CYDV RPS) were reported in Australia more recently (Nancarrow et al. 2019; Nancarrow et al. 2023), while the luteovirus barley yellow dwarf virus PAS (BYDV PAS) has not previously been reported in Australia. During 2010, an oat plant exhibiting yellow/ red leaf discoloration and stunted growth was collected from a roadside in Horsham, Victoria, Australia. The plant tested positive for BYDV PAV and negative for BYDV MAV, CYDV RPV and MYDV RMV by tissue blot immunoassay (TBIA) as described by Trębicki et al (2017). The virus isolate has since been continuously maintained in a glasshouse in live wheat plants using aphids (). In 2021, total RNA extracted from a wheat plant infected with this isolate (Nancarrow et al. 2023) tested positive for BYDV PAV by RT-PCR using the primers BYDV-1/BYDV-2 (Rastgou et al. 2005), but negative for BYDV PAV, CYDV RPV and MYDV RMV using other published primers (Deb and Anderson 2008). A high-throughput sequencing (HTS) library was prepared from the total RNA with the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) without ribosomal RNA depletion and sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina). Raw reads were trimmed and filtered using fastp v0.20.0 (Chen et al. 2018) while de novo assembly of all of the resulting 5,049,052 reads was done using SPAdes v3.15.3 (Nurk et al. 2017). BLASTn analysis of the resulting 4,067 contigs (128- 12,457 bp in length) revealed only one large virus-like contig (5,649 bp) which was most similar to BYDV PAS isolates on NCBI GenBank, sharing 87% nucleotide (nt) identity with BYDV PAS isolate OH2 (MN128939), 86% nt identity with the BYDV PAS reference sequence (NC_002160) and 82% nt identity with the BYDV PAV reference sequence (NC_004750). Additionally, 4,008 HTS reads were mapped to the assembled genome sequence with Bowtie2 v2.4.5. (Langmead and Salzberg 2012) with 100% genome coverage and an average coverage depth of 101X. Primers were designed to the assembled genome sequence to generate overlapping amplicons across the genome, and the resulting amplicons were Sanger sequenced. This confirmed the genome sequence of BYDV PAS isolate PT from Australia (5649 bp, GC content 47.9%), which was deposited in GenBank (LC782749). Ten additional plant samples collected from western Victoria, Australia, all tested positive for BYDV PAS by RT-PCR using the primers PASF and PASR (Laney et al. 2018). The additional samples consisted of one oat sample collected in 2005, one barley sample collected in 2007, three wheat samples collected in 2016 and one barley, one brome grass ( sp.) and three wheat samples collected in 2020. BYDV PAS is also efficiently transmitted by but is often more prevalent and severe than BYDV PAV; it can also overcome some sources of virus resistance that are effective against BYDV PAV (Chay et al. 1996, Robertson and French 2007). To our knowledge, this is the first report of BYDV PAS in Australia. Further work is needed to determine the extent of its distribution, incidence, impacts and epidemiology in Australia, along with its relationship to other BYDV PAS isolates.