Suppr超能文献

华法林单药治疗与华法林联合阿司匹林治疗左心室辅助装置成年患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin Monotherapy vs. Warfarin and Aspirin for Adult Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Bandaru Revanth Reddy, Rawat Anurag, Jalali Illahay, Isaak Abraham K, Alrahahleh Alahed A, Bataineh Sohaib M, Wei Calvin R, Hirani Shamsha

机构信息

Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, USA.

Interventional Cardiology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jan 28;16(1):e53101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53101. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of warfarin plus aspirin versus warfarin monotherapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). The present meta-analysis was conducted using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two authors systematically searched online databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to December 31, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included any thrombotic event, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality. A total of five articles were included in the meta-analysis, enrolling a pooled sample size of 876 patients, including 405 in the warfarin monotherapy group and 471 in the warfarin plus aspirin group. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of thrombotic events was not significantly different between the two groups (risk ratio (RR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-1.37). The risk of bleeding events was significantly lower in patients receiving warfarin alone compared to patients receiving aspirin plus warfarin (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53-0.85). The risk of all-cause mortality was not significantly different between patients receiving warfarin alone and patients receiving aspirin plus warfarin (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.65-1.30). Despite the potential benefits of discontinuing aspirin, the decision should be approached cautiously, considering the undefined risks of discontinuing anticoagulation in LVAD patients.

摘要

本荟萃分析的目的是评估华法林联合阿司匹林与华法林单药治疗在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者中的安全性和有效性。本荟萃分析按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。两位作者系统检索了在线数据库,包括自数据库建立至2023年12月31日的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science。本荟萃分析评估的结局包括任何血栓形成事件、出血事件和全因死亡率。荟萃分析共纳入5篇文章,汇总样本量为876例患者,其中华法林单药治疗组405例,华法林联合阿司匹林组471例。汇总分析显示,两组血栓形成事件的风险无显著差异(风险比(RR):0.46,95%置信区间(CI):0.15 - 1.37)。与接受阿司匹林加华法林的患者相比,单独接受华法林治疗的患者出血事件风险显著更低(RR:0.67,95% CI:0.53 - 0.85)。单独接受华法林治疗的患者与接受阿司匹林加华法林治疗的患者全因死亡率风险无显著差异(RR:0.92,95% CI:0.65 - 1.30)。尽管停用阿司匹林可能有益,但考虑到LVAD患者停用抗凝治疗存在不确定风险,应谨慎做出决定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验