• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量学校教师的心理健康行动能力:内部和外部效度证据。

Measuring mental health action competencies in school teachers: internal and external validity evidence.

作者信息

Kerry Matthew J, Robin Dominik, Albermann Kurt, Dratva Julia

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Centre of Social Paediatrics, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 13;6:1257392. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1257392. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1257392
PMID:38414714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10896949/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mental health literacy is receiving increasing research attention due to growing concerns for mental health globally. Among children, teachers have recently been recognized as playing a vital role in the recognition and reporting of potential mental health issues.

METHODS

A nationally sampled cross-section of teachers was surveyed to examine the discriminant validity of the mental health literacy measure across levels of teaching. A survey collected a total of 369 teacher responses in Switzerland (Kindergarten = 76, Primary = 210, Secondary = 83). Item response theory (IRT) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Inspection of psychometric properties indicated removal of two weak performing items. The 15-item measure exhibited a significant mean difference, such that class-responsibility function scored higher (= 2.86, = .45) than non-responsible function (= 2.68, = .45) teachers [() = -2.20, = .01]. It also exhibited a significant mean difference, such that more subjective experienced scored higher (= 2.86, = .45) than less subjective experienced (= 2.68, = .45) teachers [ = -8.66, < .01].

DISCUSSION

Hypotheses regarding age and role tenure were in the expected direction, but non-significant. The MHL measure for teachers demonstrated sound measurement properties supporting usage across teaching levels.

摘要

引言

由于全球对心理健康的关注度不断提高,心理健康素养正受到越来越多的研究关注。在儿童中,教师最近被认为在识别和报告潜在心理健康问题方面发挥着至关重要的作用。

方法

对全国范围内抽样的教师进行调查,以检验心理健康素养测量在不同教学水平上的区分效度。一项调查共收集了瑞士369名教师的回复(幼儿园 = 76名,小学 = 210名,中学 = 83名)。进行了项目反应理论(IRT)分析。

结果

对心理测量特性的检查表明,删除了两个表现不佳的项目。15个项目的测量显示出显著的平均差异,即承担班级责任的教师得分(= 2.86,= 0.45)高于不承担责任的教师(= 2.68,= 0.45)[()= -2.20,= 0.01]。它还显示出显著的平均差异,即主观体验较多的教师得分(= 2.86,= 0.45)高于主观体验较少的教师(= 2.68,= 0.45)[= -8.66,< 0.01]。

讨论

关于年龄和任职期限的假设方向符合预期,但不显著。教师的心理健康素养测量显示出良好的测量特性,支持在不同教学水平上使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/ad9b48554d60/fdgth-06-1257392-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/74da50d315a4/fdgth-06-1257392-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/1351d12b6d7b/fdgth-06-1257392-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/ad9b48554d60/fdgth-06-1257392-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/74da50d315a4/fdgth-06-1257392-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/1351d12b6d7b/fdgth-06-1257392-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9f/10896949/ad9b48554d60/fdgth-06-1257392-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring mental health action competencies in school teachers: internal and external validity evidence.衡量学校教师的心理健康行动能力:内部和外部效度证据。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 13;6:1257392. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1257392. eCollection 2024.
2
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
3
Establishment and validation of a mental health literacy measurement in Canadian educators.在加拿大教育工作者中建立和验证心理健康素养测量工具。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Sep;279:231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
4
A survey of mental health literacy in Japanese high school teachers.日本高中教师心理健康素养调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03481-y.
5
A school mental health literacy curriculum resource training approach: effects on Tanzanian teachers' mental health knowledge, stigma and help-seeking efficacy.一种学校心理健康素养课程资源培训方法:对坦桑尼亚教师心理健康知识、污名化观念及求助效能的影响
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Aug 4;10:50. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0082-6. eCollection 2016.
6
Predictors of Mental Health Literacy among Parents, Guardians, and Teachers of Adolescents in West Malaysia.马来西亚西部青少年的父母、监护人及教师心理健康素养的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 1;20(1):825. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010825.
7
Experimental evaluation of a school-based mental health literacy program in two Southeast Asian nations.在两个东南亚国家对一项基于学校的心理健康素养项目进行的实验评估。
School Ment Health. 2020 Dec;12(4):716-731. doi: 10.1007/s12310-020-09379-6. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Positive mental health literacy for teachers: adaptation and construct validation.教师的积极心理健康素养:改编与结构效度验证
Curr Psychol. 2023 May 2:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04694-y.
9
Electronic Health Literacy in Swiss-German Parents: Cross-Sectional Study of eHealth Literacy Scale Unidimensionality.瑞士德语区父母的电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表单维度性的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 13;22(3):e14492. doi: 10.2196/14492.
10
Teacher perspectives after implementing a human sexuality education program.实施一项性教育项目后的教师观点
J Sch Health. 1989 Dec;59(10):427-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb04656.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing Data and Understanding of Adolescent Mental Health Worldwide: UNICEF's Measurement of Mental Health Among Adolescents at the Population Level Initiative.全球范围内关于青少年心理健康的数据及认识不断增加:联合国儿童基金会在人口层面开展的青少年心理健康测量倡议。
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Jan;72(1S):S12-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.03.019. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Mental health problems in children and adolescents in Germany. Results of the cross-sectional KiGGS Wave 2 study and trends.德国儿童和青少年的心理健康问题。KiGGS第二轮横断面研究结果及趋势
J Health Monit. 2018 Sep 19;3(3):34-41. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-084. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Global mental health and COVID-19.
全球精神卫生与新型冠状病毒肺炎
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):655-657. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30235-2. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.健康素养的含义是什么?系统评价和定性综合。
Fam Med Community Health. 2020 May;8(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000351.
5
Coordinating health promotion in a federal state over the course of 30 years: a case report from Switzerland.30年来在一个联邦州协调健康促进工作:来自瑞士的案例报告。
Health Promot Perspect. 2019 Oct 24;9(4):323-330. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2019.45. eCollection 2019.
6
[Development and Evaluation of a Teacher Training for the Early Recognition of Depressive Symptoms in Students].[学生抑郁症状早期识别教师培训的开发与评估]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2016 Mar;66(3-4):136-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101415. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Mental health literacy in secondary schools: a Canadian approach.中学阶段的心理健康素养:一种加拿大的方法。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;24(2):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Suicide in Children: A Systematic Review.儿童自杀:一项系统综述。
Arch Suicide Res. 2015;19(3):285-304. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2014.996694.
9
The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects.年龄、时期和队列效应无法分离。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:163-5. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 May 4.
10
Health-related quality of life among children with mental disorders: a systematic review.儿童精神障碍患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Dec;21(10):1797-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0109-7.