Suppr超能文献

从社区中患有精神病的服务使用者那里获取关于远程医疗服务提供的观点:一项横断面调查研究。

Eliciting perspectives on remote healthcare delivery from service users with psychosis in the community: a cross-sectional survey study.

作者信息

Kuhn Ronja, Abdel-Halim Nadia, Healey Patrick, Bird Victoria, Elliot Kathryn, McNamee Philip

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 13;6:1304456. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304456. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The transition towards remote healthcare has been rapidly accelerated in recent years due to a number of factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, however, few studies have explored service users' views of remote mental healthcare, particularly in community mental health settings.

METHODS

As part of a larger study concerned with the development of a remotely delivered psychosocial intervention, a survey was conducted with service users with psychosis ( = 200) from six NHS trusts across England to gain cross-sectional data about service users' opinions and attitudes towards remote interventions and explore how digital access varies across different demographic groups and geographical localities.

RESULTS

The majority of service users had access to technological devices and a quiet space to receive care. Age was a key factor in motivation to engage with remote care as older participants had less access to technological devices and the internet, and reported less confidence to learn how to use new technologies compared to younger participants. Differences in access and attitudes towards remote care were found across the different geographical localities. Over half of the participants (53.1%) preferred a hybrid model (i.e., mixture of face-to-face and remotely delivered treatment), with only 4.5% preferring remote treatment exclusively. Factors that both encourage and deter service users from engaging with remote care were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study provide important information about the environmental and clinical barriers that prevent, or limit, the uptake of remotely delivered care for people with psychotic disorders. Although service users often have the ability and capacity to receive remote care, providers need to be cognisant of factors which may exacerbate digital exclusion and negatively impact the therapeutic alliance.

摘要

引言

近年来,由于包括新冠疫情在内的诸多因素,向远程医疗保健的转变迅速加速。然而,很少有研究探讨服务使用者对远程心理健康护理的看法,尤其是在社区心理健康环境中。

方法

作为一项关于远程提供心理社会干预发展的更大规模研究的一部分,对来自英格兰六个国民保健服务信托基金的200名患有精神病的服务使用者进行了一项调查,以获取关于服务使用者对远程干预的意见和态度的横断面数据,并探讨数字接入在不同人口群体和地理区域之间的差异。

结果

大多数服务使用者能够使用技术设备并有安静的空间接受护理。年龄是参与远程护理积极性的一个关键因素,因为老年参与者使用技术设备和互联网的机会较少,并且与年轻参与者相比,他们表示学习如何使用新技术的信心较低。在不同地理区域发现了远程护理接入和态度方面的差异。超过一半的参与者(53.1%)更喜欢混合模式(即面对面和远程提供治疗相结合),只有4.5%的参与者仅更喜欢远程治疗。确定了鼓励和阻碍服务使用者参与远程护理的因素。

结论

本研究的结果提供了关于阻碍或限制为精神病患者提供远程护理的环境和临床障碍的重要信息。尽管服务使用者通常有能力接受远程护理,但提供者需要认识到可能加剧数字排斥并对治疗联盟产生负面影响的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9526/10897019/558fc06d4a8c/fdgth-06-1304456-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验