Suppr超能文献

YouTube作为血管外科患者及实习生教育资源的系统评价

YouTube as a Source of Patient and Trainee Education in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Javidan Arshia, Vignarajah Muralie, Nelms Matthew W, Zhou Fangwen, Lee Yung, Naji Faysal, Kayssi Ahmed

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Jan 26;61:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.01.054. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Due to its video based approach, YouTube has become a widely accessed educational resource for patients and trainees. This systematic review characterised and evaluated the peer reviewed literature investigating YouTube as a source of patient or trainee education in vascular surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar from inception until 19 January 2023. All primary studies and conference abstracts evaluating YouTube as a source of vascular surgery education were included.

REVIEW METHODS

Video educational quality was analysed across several factors, including pathology, video audience, and length.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 studies were identified examining 3 221 videos with 123.1 hours of content and 37.1 million views. Studies primarily examined YouTube videos on diabetic foot care (7/24, 29%), peripheral arterial disease (3/24, 13%), carotid artery stenosis (3/24, 13%), varicose veins (3/24, 13%), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (2/24, 8%). Video educational quality was analysed using standardised assessment tools, author generated scoring systems, or global author reported assessment of quality. Six studies assessed videos for trainee education, while 18 studies evaluated videos for patient education. Among the 20 studies which reported on the overall quality of educational content, 10/20 studies deemed it poor, and 10/20 studies considered it fair, with 53% of studies noting poor educational quality for videos intended for patients and 40% of studies noting poor educational quality in videos intended for trainees. Poor quality videos had more views than fair quality videos (mean 27 348, 95% CI 15 154-39 543 views 11 372, 95% CI 3 115-19 629 views,  = .030).

CONCLUSION

The overall educational quality of YouTube videos for vascular surgery patient and trainee education is suboptimal. There is significant heterogeneity in the quality assessment tools used in their evaluation. A standardised approach to online education with a consistent quality assessment tool is required to better support online patient and trainee education in vascular surgery.

摘要

目的

由于其基于视频的方式,YouTube已成为患者和学员广泛使用的教育资源。本系统评价对研究YouTube作为血管外科患者或学员教育来源的同行评审文献进行了特征描述和评估。

数据来源

使用EMBASE、MEDLINE和Ovid HealthStar进行了全面的文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2023年1月19日。纳入了所有评估YouTube作为血管外科教育来源的原始研究和会议摘要。

综述方法

从病理学、视频受众和时长等多个因素分析视频教育质量。

结果

总体而言,共识别出24项研究,涉及3221个视频,内容时长123.1小时,观看次数达3710万次。研究主要涉及糖尿病足护理(7/24,29%)、外周动脉疾病(3/24,13%)、颈动脉狭窄(3/24,13%)、静脉曲张(3/24,13%)和腹主动脉瘤(2/24,8%)方面的YouTube视频。使用标准化评估工具、作者制定的评分系统或作者整体报告的质量评估来分析视频教育质量。6项研究评估了用于学员教育的视频,18项研究评估了用于患者教育的视频。在20项报告教育内容总体质量的研究中,10/20的研究认为质量较差,10/20的研究认为质量一般,53%的研究指出针对患者的视频教育质量较差,40%的研究指出针对学员的视频教育质量较差。质量差的视频比质量一般的视频观看次数更多(平均27348次,95%置信区间15154 - 39543次 11372次,95%置信区间3115 - 19629次,P = 0.030)。

结论

用于血管外科患者和学员教育的YouTube视频的整体教育质量欠佳。其评估中使用的质量评估工具存在显著异质性。需要一种采用一致质量评估工具的标准化在线教育方法,以更好地支持血管外科的在线患者和学员教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d83/10897809/b7f2711bf901/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验