Liang Zheng, Yang Yaoyao, Wang Feng, Liu Jing, Liu Lei, Mo Yanfei, Wang Min
Department of Cardiology, Lujiang County People's Hospital, Lujiang, China.
Department of Cardiology, Nanjing Pukou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1957-1970. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1079. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
The left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LV-PSL) technique, which is noninvasive and independent of pressure load, is more sensitive than is left ventricular speckle tracking imaging in detecting subtle changes in myocardial function. This study evaluated the improvement in cardiac function after application of LV-PSL in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with sacubitril/valsartan plus dapagliflozin as compared to treatment with sacubitril/valsartan monotherapy.
This prospective, multicenter, open-label study recruited 60 MI survivors with HFrEF between March 2021 and June 2022. The patients were randomly assigned in 1:1 groups, as stratified by center. Patients were randomly categorized into either an observation group [n=30; conventional treatment + 100 mg (49/51 mg) of sacubitril/valsartan, + 10 mg of dapagliflozin] or a control group [n=30; conventional treatment + 100 mg (49/51 mg) of sacubitril/valsartan]. Patients were assessed at three time points: 1 month after discharge (T1), 3 months after discharge (T3), and 6 months after discharge (T6). Two-dimensional ultrasound images were routinely collected, two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging was applied to calculate the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) rate for both groups, and LV-PSL analysis was used for the assessment of myocardial work, including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency. The results at the three follow-up visits were compared with the predischarge results (baseline, T0).
Compared with the values at T0, the LV-GLS and left ventricular myocardial work index (LVMWI) values increased in both the observation and control groups at T1, T3, and T6, with GWI and GCW showing significantly greater improvement in the observation group at T6 (GWI: 1,204±336 . 987±417 mmHg%, P=0.03; GCW: 1,401±348 . 1,206±356 mmHg%, P=0.04). Survival analysis revealed that the overall incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P=0.03). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis including GCW, GWI, GLS, and left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF), GCW emerged as the only independent predictor of occurrence of MACEs (odds ratio =1.08; 95% CI: 0.63-0.93; P<0.001).
Sacubitril/valsartan and dapagliflozin combination therapy led to a moderate improvement of cardiac function in patients with post-MI heart failure (P-MI-HF) compared to treatment with sacubitril/valsartan alone. Moreover, LV-PSL analysis can be used to assess the early prognosis of patients with P-MI-HF.
左心室压力 - 应变环(LV - PSL)技术无创且独立于压力负荷,在检测心肌功能细微变化方面比左心室斑点追踪成像更敏感。本研究评估了与沙库巴曲缬沙坦单药治疗相比,在急性心肌梗死(MI)后射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦加达格列净后左心室压力 - 应变环对心功能的改善情况。
这项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签研究在2021年3月至2022年6月期间招募了60例MI后HFrEF幸存者。患者按中心分层后以1:1分组随机分配。患者被随机分为观察组[n = 30;常规治疗 + 100 mg(49/51 mg)沙库巴曲缬沙坦 + 10 mg达格列净]或对照组[n = 30;常规治疗 + 100 mg(49/51 mg)沙库巴曲缬沙坦]。在三个时间点对患者进行评估:出院后1个月(T1)、出院后3个月(T3)和出院后6个月(T6)。常规采集二维超声图像,应用二维斑点追踪成像计算两组的左心室整体纵向应变(LV - GLS)率,并使用LV - PSL分析评估心肌做功,包括整体做功指数(GWI)、整体建设性做功(GCW)、整体无用功和整体做功效率。将三次随访结果与出院前结果(基线,T0)进行比较。
与T0时的值相比,观察组和对照组在T1、T3和T6时的LV - GLS和左心室心肌做功指数(LVMWI)值均升高,观察组在T6时GWI和GCW改善更显著(GWI:1,204±3,36.987±417 mmHg%,P = 0.03;GCW:1,401±348.1,206±356 mmHg%,P = 0.04)。生存分析显示,观察组主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的总体发生率显著低于对照组(P = 0.03)。在包括GCW、GWI、GLS和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的多因素逻辑回归分析中,GCW是MACE发生的唯一独立预测因子(比值比 = 1.08;95%CI:0.63 - 0.93;P < 0.001)。
与单独使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦和达格列净联合治疗使心肌梗死后心力衰竭(P - MI - HF)患者的心功能有适度改善。此外,LV - PSL分析可用于评估P - MI - HF患者的早期预后。