Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Åbo Akademi University, and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Apr 1;326(4):E503-E514. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00338.2023. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Metabolic flexibility (MetFlex) describes the ability to respond and adapt to changes in metabolic demand and substrate availability. The relationship between physical (in)activity and MetFlex is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether sedentary time, physical activity (PA), and cardiorespiratory fitness associate with MetFlex. Sedentary time, standing, and PA were measured with accelerometers for 4 weeks in 64 sedentary adults with metabolic syndrome [37 women, 27 men; 58.3 (SD 6.8) years]. Fitness (V̇o; mL·kg·min) was measured with graded maximal cycle ergometry. MetFlex was assessed with indirect calorimetry as the change in respiratory exchange ratio (ΔRER) from fasting to insulin stimulation with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and from low-intensity to maximal exercise. Carbohydrate (CHOox) and fat oxidation (FATox) were calculated from respiratory gases. High sedentary time associated with higher fasting RER [β = 0.35 (95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.67)], impaired insulin-stimulated MetFlex (ΔRER) [β=-0.41 (-0.72, -0.09)], and lower fasting FATox [β=-0.36 (-0.67, -0.04)]. Standing associated with lower fasting RER [β=-0.32 (-0.62, -0.02)]. Higher standing time and steps/day associated with higher fasting FATox [β = 0.31 (0.01, 0.61), and β = 0.26 (0.00, 0.53)]. Light-intensity and total PA associated with better insulin-stimulated MetFlex [β = 0.33 (0.05, 0.61)], and β = 0.33 (0.05, 0.60)]. Higher V̇o associated with higher CHOox during maximal exercise [β = 0.81 (0.62, 1.00)], as well as during insulin stimulation [β = 0.43 (0.13, 0.73)]. values are less than 0.05 for all associations. Sedentary time and PA associate with MetFlex. Reducing sitting and increasing PA of even light intensity might aid in the prevention of metabolic diseases in risk populations through their potential effects on energy metabolism. High accelerometer-assessed sedentary time associates with metabolic inflexibility measured during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp in adults with metabolic syndrome, and more light-intensity and total physical activity associate with more metabolic flexibility. Physical activity behaviors may thus play an important role in the regulation of fuel metabolism. This highlights the potential of reduced sedentary time and increased physical activity of any intensity to induce metabolic health benefits and help in disease prevention in risk populations.
代谢灵活性(MetFlex)描述了对代谢需求和底物可用性变化做出反应和适应的能力。身体活动(PA)与 MetFlex 之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定久坐时间、PA 和心肺功能与 MetFlex 之间的关系。64 名患有代谢综合征的久坐成年人(37 名女性,27 名男性;58.3[6.8]岁)佩戴加速度计进行 4 周的久坐时间、站立和 PA 测量。通过分级最大循环测功计测量 Fitness(V̇o;mL·kg·min)。MetFlex 通过间接测热法评估,方法是在胰岛素刺激下通过高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹和从低强度到最大运动时测定呼吸交换率(RER)的变化。从呼吸气体中计算出碳水化合物(CHOox)和脂肪氧化(FATox)。高久坐时间与空腹 RER 升高相关[β=0.35(95%置信区间:0.04,0.67)],胰岛素刺激的 MetFlex 受损(ΔRER)[β=-0.41(-0.72,-0.09)],空腹 FATox 降低[β=-0.36(-0.67,-0.04)]。站立与空腹 RER 降低相关[β=-0.32(-0.62,-0.02)]。更高的站立时间和每日步数与更高的空腹 FATox 相关[β=0.31(0.01,0.61),和 β=0.26(0.00,0.53)]。低强度和总 PA 与更好的胰岛素刺激的 MetFlex 相关[β=0.33(0.05,0.61),和 β=0.33(0.05,0.60)]。更高的 V̇o 与最大运动时的 CHOox 升高相关[β=0.81(0.62,1.00)],以及胰岛素刺激时的 CHOox 升高相关[β=0.43(0.13,0.73)]。所有关联的 值均小于 0.05。久坐时间和 PA 与 MetFlex 相关。减少久坐时间和增加即使是低强度的 PA 可能会通过其对能量代谢的潜在影响,有助于预防代谢疾病高危人群的代谢疾病。代谢综合征成年人高加速度计评估的久坐时间与高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹期间测量的代谢灵活性相关,更多的低强度和总体力活动与更多的代谢灵活性相关。因此,体力活动行为可能在调节燃料代谢中发挥重要作用。这凸显了减少久坐时间和增加任何强度的体力活动以诱导代谢健康益处并帮助高危人群预防疾病的潜力。