The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM) and the Centre for Physical Activity Research (CFAS), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM) and the Centre for Physical Activity Research (CFAS), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Metabolism. 2019 Jul;96:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that increased frequency of interruptions in prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia independent of energy intake and expenditure.
MATERIALS/METHODS: Healthy, sedentary, centrally obese men (n = 14; age*, 28.2 (23.4; 38.3) years; BMI, 31.9 ± 6.7 kg/m; VOmax*, 39.5 (38.8; 40.9) ml/min/kg; HbA1c, 5.3 ± 0.4% (34.1 ± 4.2 mmol/mol); mean ± SD (*median (25th; 75th percentile)) completed four 8-h interventions in randomized order: 1) uninterrupted sitting (SIT), 2) sitting interrupted by 2 min of walking (~30% of VO) every 20th minute (INT20), 3) sitting interrupted by 6 min of walking every hour (INT60), and 4) sitting interrupted by 12 min of walking every second hour (INT120). A standardized test drink was served at the beginning of and 4 h into the intervention (total of 2310 ± 247 kcal; 50% energy from carbohydrate, 50% energy from fat). Outcomes included the difference in the 8-h total area under the curve (tAUC) for primarily plasma glucose, and secondarily plasma insulin and C-peptide during INT20, INT60, and INT120 compared to SIT.
No difference [95% CI] was observed in the primary outcome, the 8-h tAUC for the plasma glucose, during INT20, INT60, and INT120 compared to SIT (-65.3 mmol/l∗min [-256.3; 125.7], +53.8 mmol/l∗min [-143.1; 250.8], and +18.6 mmol/l∗min [-172.4; 209.6], respectively).
Interrupting sitting with increasing frequency did not reduce the postprandial plasma glucose response to prolonged sitting in healthy, sedentary, centrally obese men.
本研究旨在检验以下假设,即增加长时间坐姿中的中断频率可降低餐后血糖,而不依赖于能量摄入和消耗。
材料/方法:健康、久坐、中心性肥胖的男性(n=14;年龄*,28.2(23.4;38.3)岁;BMI,31.9±6.7kg/m;VOmax*,39.5(38.8;40.9)ml/min/kg;HbA1c,5.3±0.4%(34.1±4.2mmol/mol);平均值±SD(*中位数(25 分位;75 分位))完成了四项随机干预的 8 小时试验:1)不间断坐姿(SIT),2)每 20 分钟中断 2 分钟步行(约 30%的 VO)(INT20),3)每小时中断 6 分钟步行(INT60),4)每两小时中断 12 分钟步行(INT120)。在干预开始时和 4 小时时提供了标准化的测试饮料(总计 2310±247kcal;碳水化合物提供 50%的能量,脂肪提供 50%的能量)。结果包括与 SIT 相比,INT20、INT60 和 INT120 期间 8 小时内主要血浆葡萄糖、其次是血浆胰岛素和 C 肽的总曲线下面积(tAUC)的差异。
与 SIT 相比,INT20、INT60 和 INT120 期间 8 小时内的主要血浆葡萄糖 tAUC 无差异[95%CI](-65.3mmol/lmin[-256.3;125.7],+53.8mmol/lmin[-143.1;250.8]和+18.6mmol/l*min[-172.4;209.6])。
在健康、久坐、中心性肥胖的男性中,增加坐姿中断的频率并不能降低长时间坐姿后的餐后血糖反应。