• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化电子生命维持治疗撤单医嘱集的观察结果。

Observations from Optimizing an Electronic Order Set for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment.

机构信息

Palliative Medicine, OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;27(7):846-853. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0380. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2023.0380
PMID:38416599
Abstract

Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) is a process with unique pressure for all involved. The use of an electronic order set can facilitate best care. To assess utilization of a WLST order set and time to inpatient death before and after optimization. A retrospective chart review for 12-month periods before and after enhancements to a WLST order set. Multicenter study within an American, not-for-profit health care system of inpatient decedents July 2017-June 2018 and April 2021-March 2022 with orders placed via WLST order set. Co-primary outcomes included order set utilization and time from activation of orders to patient death. Descriptive analyses featured demographics, palliative consultation, ordering clinician type/specialty, and COVID-19. A total of 1949 patients had orders placed via the WLST order set and died in-hospital. Compared with the 2017-2018 period, use increased 35.8% in 2021-2022. Time to death after release of orders was significantly longer for the 2021-2022 group (4.4 vs. 3.7 hours). Demographic details included nurse practitioners (39%) as most frequent WLST order set utilizer and palliative consultation in 46% of terminal hospitalizations. Among decedents with consultation, palliative clinicians were the WLST order set utilizer for 47% of cases (i.e., 21% of all WLST order set utilizations). The median time to death was significantly longer when orders were placed by a palliative clinician (4.5 hours) compared with nonpalliative specialists (3.9 hours). COVID-19 was a hospital diagnosis for 29% of decedents in the 2021-2022 group. In the emotionally and cognitively intense process that is WLST, an order set provides a modifiable panel of defaults. Our experience highlights the power in guiding primary palliative care for WLST in the hospital setting and suggests that advanced practice providers and nonpalliative clinicians, as primary utilizers, be integral in the design of a WLST order set.

摘要

停止生命维持治疗 (WLST) 是一个涉及所有相关人员的独特压力过程。电子医嘱集的使用可以促进最佳护理。评估 WLST 医嘱集的使用情况和优化前后住院患者的死亡时间。回顾性图表审查了 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月和 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间增强 WLST 医嘱集前后 12 个月的住院死亡患者。这是一个在美国非营利性医疗机构内进行的多中心研究,患者在 2017-2018 年和 2021-2022 年期间通过 WLST 医嘱集下达了医嘱。主要结局包括医嘱集的使用情况和从医嘱激活到患者死亡的时间。描述性分析包括人口统计学特征、姑息治疗咨询、开医嘱的临床医生类型/专业以及 COVID-19。共有 1949 名患者通过 WLST 医嘱集下达了医嘱并在院内死亡。与 2017-2018 年相比,2021-2022 年的使用率增加了 35.8%。2021-2022 年组释放医嘱后死亡的时间明显更长(4.4 小时比 3.7 小时)。人口统计学细节包括执业护士(39%)是最常使用 WLST 医嘱集的人群,46%的终末期住院患者接受了姑息治疗咨询。在接受咨询的死者中,姑息治疗临床医生是 WLST 医嘱集使用者,占病例的 47%(即所有 WLST 医嘱集使用者的 21%)。当医嘱由姑息治疗临床医生下达时,死亡的中位时间明显更长(4.5 小时),而非姑息治疗专家(3.9 小时)。在 2021-2022 年组中,29%的死者被诊断患有 COVID-19。在 WLST 这个情感和认知上都很紧张的过程中,医嘱集提供了一组可修改的默认值。我们的经验强调了在医院环境中指导 WLST 的主要姑息治疗的力量,并表明初级实践提供者和非姑息治疗临床医生作为主要使用者,在 WLST 医嘱集的设计中不可或缺。

相似文献

1
Observations from Optimizing an Electronic Order Set for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment.优化电子生命维持治疗撤单医嘱集的观察结果。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Jul;27(7):846-853. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0380. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Early Comfort Care Following Operative Intervention for Traumatic Injury.创伤性损伤手术干预后的早期舒适护理
Am Surg. 2020 Aug;86(8):933-936. doi: 10.1177/0003134820940255. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Examining racial disparities in the time to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in trauma.探讨创伤患者接受生命维持治疗停止的时间上的种族差异。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Apr;84(4):590-597. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001775.
4
Ventilator Weaning and Terminal Extubation: Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Children. Secondary Analysis of the Death One Hour After Terminal Extubation Study.呼吸机撤机和终末拔管:儿童生命支持治疗的撤离。终末拔管后 1 小时死亡研究的二次分析。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;52(3):396-406. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006101. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
5
Population Characteristics and Markers for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.体外膜肺氧合患者生命支持治疗撤机的人口统计学特征和标志物。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Mar;36(3):833-839. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.04.040. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Prediction of death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments.维持生命治疗撤除后的死亡预测。
Crit Care Resusc. 2008 Dec;10(4):278-84.
7
Examining the independent risk factors for withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in trauma patients.探讨创伤患者停止生命支持治疗的独立风险因素。
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111088. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111088. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
8
Insurance Type and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Critically Injured Trauma Patients.保险类型与创伤危重症患者生命支持治疗的撤停
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421711. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21711.
9
Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest.基于感知到的神经学预后而提前撤掉生命维持治疗与心脏骤停后的死亡率之间的关联。
Resuscitation. 2016 May;102:127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Who has life-sustaining therapy withdrawn after injury?谁在受伤后接受了生命维持治疗的撤除?
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1320-6; discussion 1326-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196003.41799.41.