• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在糖尿病血糖控制改善研究(GRADE)中,2 型糖尿病治疗方案对糖尿病困扰和抑郁症状的影响存在差异。

Differential Effects of Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Regimens on Diabetes Distress and Depressive Symptoms in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).

机构信息

Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY.

Division of Endocrinology and Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):610-619. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2459.

DOI:10.2337/dc23-2459
PMID:38416773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10973899/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether adding basal insulin to metformin in adults with early type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) would increase emotional distress relative to other treatments.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE) of adults with T2DM of <10 years' duration, HbA1c 6.8-8.5%, and taking metformin monotherapy randomly assigned participants to add insulin glargine U-100, sulfonylurea glimepiride, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, or the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor sitagliptin. The Emotional Distress Substudy enrolled 1,739 GRADE participants (mean [SD] age 58.0 [10.2] years, 32% female, 56% non-Hispanic White, 18% non-Hispanic Black, 17% Hispanic) and assessed diabetes distress and depressive symptoms every 6 months. Analyses examined differences at 1 year and over the 3-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Across treatments, diabetes distress (-0.24, P < 0.0001) and depressive symptoms (-0.67, P < 0.0001) decreased over 1 year. Diabetes distress was lower at 1 year for the glargine group than for the other groups combined (-0.10, P = 0.002). Diabetes distress was also lower for liraglutide than for glimepiride or sitagliptin (-0.10, P = 0.008). Over the 3-year follow-up, there were no significant group differences in total diabetes distress; interpersonal diabetes distress remained lower for those assigned to liraglutide. No significant differences were observed for depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to expectations, this randomized trial found no evidence for a deleterious effect of basal insulin on emotional distress. Glargine lowered diabetes distress modestly at 1 year rather than increasing it. Liraglutide also reduced diabetes distress at 1 year. Results can inform treatment decisions for adults with early T2DM.

摘要

目的

我们评估了在病程<10 年、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)6.8-8.5%、正在接受二甲双胍单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)成人患者中,加用基础胰岛素对比其他治疗方案是否会导致更严重的情绪困扰。

研究设计和方法

血糖控制达标治疗的比较和评估研究(GRADE)纳入了病程<10 年、HbA1c 6.8-8.5%、正在接受二甲双胍单药治疗的 T2DM 成人患者,随机分组后分别接受甘精胰岛素 U-100、格列美脲、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂利拉鲁肽或二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂西格列汀治疗。情绪困扰亚研究纳入了 1739 例 GRADE 参与者(平均[标准差]年龄 58.0[10.2]岁,32%为女性,56%为非西班牙裔白人,18%为非西班牙裔黑人,17%为西班牙裔),每 6 个月评估一次糖尿病困扰和抑郁症状。分析比较了治疗 1 年和 3 年随访期间的差异。

结果

在所有治疗组中,糖尿病困扰(-0.24,P<0.0001)和抑郁症状(-0.67,P<0.0001)在 1 年内逐渐减轻。与其他治疗组相比,甘精胰岛素组治疗 1 年后的糖尿病困扰程度更低(-0.10,P=0.002)。与格列美脲或西格列汀相比,利拉鲁肽组的糖尿病困扰程度也更低(-0.10,P=0.008)。在 3 年随访期间,各组间的总体糖尿病困扰程度无显著差异;与接受利拉鲁肽治疗的患者相比,接受其他治疗的患者的人际间糖尿病困扰程度仍较低。两组间的抑郁症状也无显著差异。

结论

与预期相反,这项随机试验并未发现基础胰岛素会对情绪困扰产生有害影响的证据。甘精胰岛素在 1 年内适度降低了糖尿病困扰,而不是增加了它。利拉鲁肽也降低了 1 年内的糖尿病困扰。这些结果可以为病程早期的 T2DM 成人患者的治疗决策提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6737/10973899/9cc720d88b20/dc232459F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6737/10973899/9cc720d88b20/dc232459F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6737/10973899/9cc720d88b20/dc232459F0GA.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Effects of Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Regimens on Diabetes Distress and Depressive Symptoms in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).在糖尿病血糖控制改善研究(GRADE)中,2 型糖尿病治疗方案对糖尿病困扰和抑郁症状的影响存在差异。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):610-619. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2459.
2
Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Glycemic Outcomes.2 型糖尿病的血糖降低 - 血糖结果。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1063-1074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200433.
3
Comparative Effects of Glucose-Lowering Medications on Kidney Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: The GRADE Randomized Clinical Trial.降糖药物对 2 型糖尿病患者肾脏结局影响的比较:GRADE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jul 1;183(7):705-714. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1487.
4
Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes-Hypoglycemia outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.2 型糖尿病患者血糖降低-低血糖结局:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0309907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309907. eCollection 2024.
5
Emulating the GRADE trial using real world data: retrospective comparative effectiveness study.使用真实世界数据模拟 GRADE 试验:回顾性比较有效性研究。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 3;379:e070717. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070717.
6
Baseline Characteristics of Randomized Participants in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).糖尿病血糖降低方法的随机参与者的基线特征:一项比较效果研究(GRADE)。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Nov;42(11):2098-2107. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0901. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
The Use of Rescue Insulin in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).《糖尿病血糖降低方法中应用抢救胰岛素的比较有效性研究(GRADE)》
Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):638-645. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0516.
8
[In patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin, the addition of which antihyperglycemic class among a sulfonylurea (glimepiride), a DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin), a GLP-1 agonist (liraglutide), or basal insulin (glargine) is the most effective to achieve and maintain good glycemic control?].在使用二甲双胍的2型糖尿病患者中,添加磺脲类药物(格列美脲)、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(西他列汀)、胰高血糖素样肽-1激动剂(利拉鲁肽)或基础胰岛素(甘精胰岛素)中的哪一类抗高血糖药物,对于实现并维持良好的血糖控制最为有效?
Rev Med Interne. 2023 Jan;44(1):48-49. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
9
Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Microvascular and Cardiovascular Outcomes.2 型糖尿病患者的血糖降低——微血管和心血管结局。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1075-1088. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200436.
10
Association of Baseline Factors With Glycemic Outcomes in GRADE: A Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.基线因素与 GRADE 血糖结局的关联:一项比较有效性随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):562-570. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1782.

引用本文的文献

1
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists as emerging therapeutics in bipolar disorder: a narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂作为双相情感障碍的新兴治疗方法:临床前和临床证据的叙述性综述
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03261-0.
2
Lack of Association of Emotional Distress With Insulin Initiation in the GRADE Randomized Diabetes Comparative Effectiveness Trial.在GRADE随机糖尿病比较疗效试验中,情绪困扰与开始使用胰岛素之间缺乏关联。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Aug;51(4):382-393. doi: 10.1177/26350106251361363. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
3
Association Between Baseline Diabetes Therapy-Related Quality of Life (DTR-QOL) and Subsequent Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study (Diabetes Distress and Care Registry at Tenri [DDCRT 26]).

本文引用的文献

1
Does awareness of diabetic status increase risk of depressive or anxious symptoms? Findings from the China Multi-Ethnic cohort (CMEC) study.糖尿病状态意识是否会增加抑郁或焦虑症状的风险?来自中国多民族队列(CMEC)研究的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 1;320:218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.135. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Glycemia Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes - Glycemic Outcomes.2 型糖尿病的血糖降低 - 血糖结果。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1063-1074. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200433.
3
Diabetes, antidiabetic medications and risk of depression - A population-based cohort and nested case-control study.
基线糖尿病治疗相关生活质量(DTR-QOL)与全因死亡后续风险之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究(天理糖尿病困扰与护理登记处[DDCRT 26])
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01755-2.
4
Addressing Diabetes Distress in Primary Care: Where Are We Now, and Where Do We Need to Go?解决初级保健中的糖尿病困扰:我们目前的状况如何,以及我们需要何去何从?
Curr Diab Rep. 2025 Jan 18;25(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s11892-025-01576-4.
5
Patient-important outcomes in type 2 diabetes: The paradigm of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.2 型糖尿病的患者重要结局:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的范例。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;21(4):14791641241269743. doi: 10.1177/14791641241269743.
糖尿病、抗糖尿病药物与抑郁症风险——基于人群的队列研究和巢式病例对照研究。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Jun;140:105715. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105715. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
The bidirectional longitudinal association between depressive symptoms and HbA : A systematic review and meta-analysis.抑郁症状与 HbA1c 之间的双向纵向关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2022 Feb;39(2):e14671. doi: 10.1111/dme.14671. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
5
SITAgliptin for Depressive Symptoms in Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.西他列汀治疗 2 型糖尿病患者抑郁症状的可行性随机对照试验。
Psychosom Med. 2021 Oct 1;83(8):913-923. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000985.
6
Study of emotional distress in a comparative effectiveness trial of diabetes treatments: Rationale and design.糖尿病治疗的比较效果试验中的情绪困扰研究:原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106366. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106366. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Associations of depression and diabetes distress with self-management behavior and glycemic control.抑郁和糖尿病困扰与自我管理行为和血糖控制的关系。
Health Psychol. 2021 Feb;40(2):113-124. doi: 10.1037/hea0001037. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Antidiabetes Agents and Incident Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.抗糖尿病药物与新发抑郁:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):3050-3060. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1561. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
9
Using Insulin to Treat Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes in 2020.2020年使用胰岛素治疗控制不佳的2型糖尿病
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2419-2420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1303.
10
Longitudinal associations between depression and diabetes complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抑郁与糖尿病并发症的纵向关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2019 Dec;36(12):1562-1572. doi: 10.1111/dme.14054. Epub 2019 Jul 31.