• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育干预对女性医疗保健提供者关于乳腺癌风险模型使用和高风险筛查建议知识差距的影响。

Effect of an Educational Intervention on Women's Health Care Provider Knowledge Gaps About Breast Cancer Risk Model Use and High-risk Screening Recommendations.

机构信息

DenseBreast-info, Inc, Deer Park, NY, USA.

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Department of Radiology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Breast Imaging. 2023 Feb 6;5(1):30-39. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbac072.

DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbac072
PMID:38416962
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess effectiveness of a web-based educational intervention on women's health care provider knowledge of breast cancer risk models and high-risk screening recommendations.

METHODS

A web-based pre- and post-test study including 177 U.S.-based women's health care providers was conducted in 2019. Knowledge gaps were defined as fewer than 75% of respondents answering correctly. Pre- and post-test knowledge differences (McNemar test) and associations of baseline characteristics with pre-test knowledge gaps (logistic regression) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Respondents included 131/177 (74.0%) physicians; 127/177 (71.8%) practiced obstetrics/gynecology. Pre-test, 118/177 (66.7%) knew the Gail model predicts lifetime invasive breast cancer risk; this knowledge gap persisted post-test [(121/177, 68.4%); P = 0.77]. Just 39.0% (69/177) knew the Gail model identifies women eligible for risk-reducing medications; this knowledge gap resolved. Only 48.6% (86/177) knew the Gail model should not be used to identify women meeting high-risk MRI screening guidelines; this deficiency decreased to 66.1% (117/177) post-test (P = 0.001). Pre-test, 47.5% (84/177) knew the Tyrer-Cuzick model is used to identify women meeting high-risk screening MRI criteria, 42.9% (76/177) to predict BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutation risk, and 26.0% (46/177) to predict lifetime invasive breast cancer risk. These knowledge gaps persisted but improved. For a high-risk 30-year-old, 67.8% (120/177) and 54.2% (96/177) pre-test knew screening MRI and mammography/tomosynthesis are recommended, respectively; 19.2% (34/177) knew both are recommended; and 53% (94/177) knew US is not recommended. These knowledge gaps resolved or reduced.

CONCLUSION

Web-based education can reduce important provider knowledge gaps about breast cancer risk models and high-risk screening recommendations.

摘要

目的

评估基于网络的教育干预措施对女性健康护理提供者乳腺癌风险模型和高危筛查建议知识的有效性。

方法

2019 年进行了一项基于网络的预-后测试研究,包括 177 名美国女性健康护理提供者。知识差距定义为少于 75%的受访者回答正确。评估了预-后测试知识差异(McNemar 检验)以及基线特征与预测试知识差距的关联(逻辑回归)。

结果

受访者包括 131/177(74.0%)名医生;127/177(71.8%)名医生从事妇产科工作。在预测试中,118/177(66.7%)名参与者知道 Gail 模型预测终生浸润性乳腺癌风险;这一知识差距在测试后仍然存在[(121/177,68.4%);P=0.77]。只有 39.0%(69/177)名参与者知道 Gail 模型可识别适合使用降低风险药物的女性;这一知识差距得到了解决。只有 48.6%(86/177)名参与者知道 Gail 模型不应用于识别符合高危 MRI 筛查指南的女性;这一缺陷在测试后减少到 66.1%(117/177)(P=0.001)。在预测试中,47.5%(84/177)名参与者知道 Tyrer-Cuzick 模型用于识别符合高危筛查 MRI 标准的女性,42.9%(76/177)名参与者知道预测 BRCA1/2 致病性突变风险,26.0%(46/177)名参与者知道预测终生浸润性乳腺癌风险。这些知识差距仍然存在,但有所改善。对于一位高危 30 岁女性,67.8%(120/177)和 54.2%(96/177)名参与者在预测试中分别知道推荐进行筛查 MRI 和乳房 X 线断层合成术;19.2%(34/177)名参与者知道两者均推荐;53%(94/177)名参与者知道不推荐使用 US。这些知识差距得到解决或缩小。

结论

基于网络的教育可以减少关于乳腺癌风险模型和高危筛查建议的重要提供者知识差距。

相似文献

1
Effect of an Educational Intervention on Women's Health Care Provider Knowledge Gaps About Breast Cancer Risk Model Use and High-risk Screening Recommendations.教育干预对女性医疗保健提供者关于乳腺癌风险模型使用和高风险筛查建议知识差距的影响。
J Breast Imaging. 2023 Feb 6;5(1):30-39. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbac072.
2
Effect of an educational intervention on women's healthcare provider knowledge gaps about breast density, breast cancer risk, and screening.教育干预对女性医疗保健提供者关于乳腺密度、乳腺癌风险和筛查知识差距的影响。
Menopause. 2021 Apr 26;28(8):909-917. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001780.
3
Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.接受筛查性乳房 X 光检查的女性预估终生乳腺癌风险分布。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):48-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23333. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析 Tyrer-Cuzick 和 Gail 在江西省乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 9;24:5528-5532. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910108.
5
Radiologic Technologist and Radiologist Knowledge Gaps about Breast Density Revealed by an Online Continuing Education Course.在线继续教育课程揭示放射技师和放射科医生在乳腺密度方面的知识差距
J Breast Imaging. 2020 Aug 10;2(4):315-329. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa039.
6
Guideline-inconsistent breast cancer screening for women over 50: a vignette-based survey.50岁以上女性不符合指南的乳腺癌筛查:一项基于病例 vignette 的调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):82-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2567-1. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
7
Variation in Breast Cancer Risk Model Estimates Among Women in Their 40s Seen in Primary Care.在初级保健中观察到的40多岁女性乳腺癌风险模型估计值的差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Apr;31(4):495-502. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0299. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge and opinions about the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) committee, the Women's Health Amendment, and the Affordable Care Act: national study after the release of the USPSTF 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation Statement.妇产科医生对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)委员会、《妇女健康修正案》及《平价医疗法案》的了解与看法:USPSTF 2009年乳腺癌筛查建议声明发布后的全国性研究
Prev Med. 2014 Feb;59:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
9
Home visits to improve breast health knowledge and screening practices in a less privileged area in Jordan.在约旦一个贫困地区进行家访,以提高乳房健康知识和筛查实践。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 6;14:428. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-428.
10
The Value of Tyrer-Cuzick Versus Gail Risk Modeling in Predicting Benefit from Screening MRI in Breast Cancer.泰瑞尔-库齐克模型与盖尔风险模型在预测乳腺癌筛查性磁共振成像获益方面的价值
Eur J Breast Health. 2021 Dec 30;18(1):79-84. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-8-2. eCollection 2022 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: Why is genetic testing underutilized worldwide? The case for hereditary breast cancer.评论:为何基因检测在全球范围内未得到充分利用?以遗传性乳腺癌为例。
BJC Rep. 2024 Oct 1;2(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00099-x.
2
Patterns and Predictors of Referral for Screening Breast MRI: A Mixed-Methods Study.筛查性乳腺 MRI 转诊的模式和预测因素:一项混合方法研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 May;33(5):639-649. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0557. Epub 2024 Mar 14.