Department of, Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Radiology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 May;33(5):639-649. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0557. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Women with ≥20% lifetime breast cancer risk can receive supplemental breast cancer screening with MRI. We examined factors associated with recommendation for screening breast MRI among primary care providers (PCPs), gynecologists (GYNs), and radiologists. We conducted a sequential mixed-methods study. Participants ( = 72) reported recommendations for mammogram and breast MRI via clinical vignettes describing hypothetical patients with moderate, high, and very high breast cancer risk. Logistic regressions assessed the relationships of clinician-level factors (gender, specialty, years practicing) and practice-level factors (practice type, imaging facilities available) with screening recommendations. We interviewed a subset of survey participants ( = 17, 17/72 = 24%) regarding their decision-making about breast cancer screening recommendations. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with directed content analysis. Compared with PCPs, GYNs and radiologists were significantly more likely to recommend breast MRI for high-risk (ORs = 4.09 and 4.09, respectively) and very-high-risk patients (ORs = 8.56 and 18.33, respectively). Qualitative analysis identified two key phases along the clinical pathway for high-risk women. Phase 1 was "identifying high-risk women," which included three subthemes (systems for risk assessment, barriers to risk assessment, scope of practice issues). Phase 2 was "referral for screening," which included three subthemes (conflicting guidelines, scope of practice issues, legal implications). Frequency of themes differed between specialties, potentially explaining findings from the quantitative phase. There are significant differences between specialties in supplemental breast cancer screening recommendations. Multilevel interventions are needed to support identification and management of women with high breast cancer risk, particularly for PCPs.
对于乳腺癌风险≥20%的女性,可以接受补充性乳腺癌筛查磁共振成像(MRI)。我们研究了与初级保健提供者(PCP)、妇科医生(GYN)和放射科医生推荐筛查性乳腺 MRI 相关的因素。我们进行了一项顺序混合方法研究。参与者(n=72)通过描述具有中度、高度和极高乳腺癌风险的假设患者的临床案例,报告了对乳房 X 光检查和乳腺 MRI 的建议。逻辑回归评估了与临床医生层面因素(性别、专业、从业年限)和实践层面因素(实践类型、可用成像设施)相关的筛查建议的关系。我们对调查参与者的一部分(n=17,17/72=24%)进行了关于他们对乳腺癌筛查建议决策的访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用定向内容分析进行了分析。与 PCP 相比,GYN 和放射科医生更有可能为高风险(OR=4.09 和 4.09)和极高风险(OR=8.56 和 18.33)患者推荐乳腺 MRI。定性分析确定了高危女性临床途径的两个关键阶段。第一阶段是“识别高危女性”,包括三个子主题(风险评估系统、风险评估障碍、实践范围问题)。第二阶段是“筛查转诊”,包括三个子主题(指南冲突、实践范围问题、法律影响)。不同专业之间的主题频率不同,这可能解释了定量阶段的发现。在补充性乳腺癌筛查建议方面,不同专业之间存在显著差异。需要采取多层次干预措施,以支持对高乳腺癌风险女性的识别和管理,尤其是对 PCP 而言。