Bolten Samantha, Lott Timothy T, Ralyea Robert D, Gianforte Anika, Trmcic Aljosa, Orsi Renato H, Martin Nicole H, Wiedmann Martin
Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Food Safety Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Food Prot. 2024 Apr;87(4):100254. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100254. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Small- and medium-sized dairy processing facilities (SMDFs) may face unique challenges with respect to controlling Listeria in their processing environments, e.g., due to limited resources. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate environmental monitoring programs (EMPs) for Listeria control in eight SMDFs in a ∼1-year longitudinal study; this included a comparison of pre-operation (i.e., after cleaning and sanitation and prior to production) and mid-operation (i.e., at least 4 h into production) sampling strategies. Among 2,072 environmental sponge samples collected across all facilities, 272 (13%) were positive for Listeria. Listeria prevalence among pre- and mid-operation samples (15% and 17%, respectively), was not significantly different. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) performed on select isolates to characterize Listeria persistence patterns revealed repeated isolation of closely related Listeria isolates (i.e., ≤20 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism [hqSNP] differences) in 5/8 facilities over >6 months, suggesting Listeria persistence and/or reintroduction was relatively common among the SMDFs evaluated here. WGS furthermore showed that for 41 sites where samples collected pre- and mid-operation were positive for Listeria, Listeria isolates obtained were highly related (i.e., ≤10 hqSNP differences), suggesting that pre-operation sampling alone may be sufficient and more effective for detecting sites of Listeria persistence. Importantly, our data also showed that only 1/8 of facilities showed a significant decrease in Listeria prevalence over 1 year, indicating continued challenges with Listeria control in at least some SMDFs. We conclude that options for simplified Listeria EMPs (e.g., with a focus on pre-operation sampling, which allows for more rapid identification of likely persistence sites) may be valuable for improved Listeria control in SMDFs.
中小型乳制品加工设施(SMDFs)在其加工环境中控制李斯特菌方面可能面临独特挑战,例如由于资源有限。本研究的目的是在一项为期约1年的纵向研究中,在8个SMDFs中实施并评估用于控制李斯特菌的环境监测计划(EMPs);这包括对运行前(即清洁和卫生处理后且生产前)和运行中期(即生产至少4小时后)采样策略的比较。在所有设施收集的2072份环境海绵样本中,272份(13%)李斯特菌检测呈阳性。运行前和运行中期样本中的李斯特菌患病率(分别为15%和17%)无显著差异。对选定分离株进行全基因组测序(WGS)以表征李斯特菌的持续存在模式,结果显示在5/8的设施中,超过6个月反复分离出密切相关的李斯特菌分离株(即≤20个高质量单核苷酸多态性[hqSNP]差异),这表明李斯特菌的持续存在和/或重新引入在本评估的SMDFs中相对常见。WGS还显示,对于运行前和运行中期采集的样本李斯特菌检测呈阳性的41个位点,获得的李斯特菌分离株高度相关(即≤10个hqSNP差异),这表明仅运行前采样可能足以且更有效地检测李斯特菌持续存在的位点。重要的是,我们的数据还表明,只有1/8的设施在1年中李斯特菌患病率显著下降,这表明至少在一些SMDFs中,控制李斯特菌仍然面临挑战。我们得出结论,简化的李斯特菌EMPs选项(例如,侧重于运行前采样,这允许更快速地识别可能的持续存在位点)对于改善SMDFs中的李斯特菌控制可能很有价值。